% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Schmidt:1003249,
author = {Schmidt, Patrick},
othercontributors = {Kobbelt, Leif and Ben-Chen, Mirela},
title = {{I}ntrinsic optimization of maps between surfaces},
school = {RWTH Aachen University},
type = {Dissertation},
address = {Aachen},
publisher = {RWTH Aachen University},
reportid = {RWTH-2025-00939},
pages = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen},
year = {2024},
note = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen
University 2025; Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, 2024},
abstract = {This thesis addresses the construction and optimization of
high-quality maps between the surfaces of 3D shapes. Within
the field of geometry processing, there is an increasing
demand for methods that, instead of operating on individual
shapes in isolation, process entire shape collections in
correspondence. A key component in such scenarios are
surface maps: functions defining a geometric point-to-point
relationship between two or more surfaces. Such maps open
the door to numerous applications ranging from attribute
transfer, over spatial and temporal shape interpolation, to
co-analysis and co-synthesis of surface data, or the
generation of common base domains for higher-level
processing algorithms. In this work, we tackle the intricate
tasks of generating surface homeomorphisms (a class of maps
that strictly ensure continuity and bijectivity) and
optimizing them for low intrinsic mapping distortion. In
contrast to previous approaches, which were only able to
either guarantee homeomorphisms or minimize distortion, we
establish a novel algorithmic framework that allows
combining both aspects. To set the stage for our
contributions, we start by reviewing a wide range of
approaches to the surface mapping problem. Along the way, we
provide in-depth introductions to concepts from surface
parametrization, geometry processing in spherical and
hyperbolic domains, as well as non-linear continuous
optimization. We then present three methods targeting
different scenarios: maps between disk-topology surfaces in
a free-boundary setting, maps between closed surfaces of
arbitrary genus, and multi-resolution maps within
collections of genus-0 shapes. We conclude by providing a
tool for automatic differentiation that not only powers
these surface mapping methods but makes non-linear
optimization techniques practically available in a much
broader range of geometry processing tasks.},
cin = {122310 / 120000},
ddc = {004},
cid = {$I:(DE-82)122310_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)120000_20140620$},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
doi = {10.18154/RWTH-2025-00939},
url = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/1003249},
}