h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Louo:1015160,
      author       = {Loução, Ricardo},
      othercontributors = {Shah, Nadim Joni and Veselinovic, Tanja},
      title        = {{A}nalysis of multi-b-value diffusion {MRI} data for
                      characterisation of healthy and pathological brain tissue},
      school       = {Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Aachen},
      publisher    = {RWTH Aachen University},
      reportid     = {RWTH-2025-06232},
      pages        = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen},
      year         = {2025},
      note         = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen
                      University 2026; Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälische
                      Technische Hochschule Aachen, 2025},
      abstract     = {Typically quantified by the apparent diffusion coefficient
                      (ADC), diffusion MRI measures water diffusion in biological
                      tissues which in turn is seen as a probe of microstructural
                      changes derived from pathology. However, the ADC is
                      confounded by a number of processes and phenomena rendering
                      it sub-optimal for the characterisation of brain tissues.
                      Additionally, the even more complex micro-environments of
                      pathologies like brain tumours do not lend themselves to be
                      properly summarised by a single value. In this work, two
                      methods for the acquisition and analysis of multi-b-value
                      dMRI data were developed, expanding the ADC formalism and
                      keeping in mind clinical feasibility. The first is a unified
                      model for the measurement of perfusion, and Gaussian and
                      non- Gaussian diffusion. This is achieved by sampling the
                      tissue at 16 unique b-values, from 0 to 3,000 s/mm2, while
                      including the clinically established b = 1,000 s/mm2. With
                      an acquisition time of 4 minutes and 19 seconds, four
                      quantities can be derived from this protocol:
                      pseudo-diffusivity and perfusion fraction, characterising
                      the perfusion regime; apparent diffusivity, describing
                      Gaussian diffusion; and apparent kurtosis, as a measure of
                      non-Gaussian diffusion. This method was validated in vivo in
                      a brain tumour patient cohort by pinning the derived
                      quantities against their counterparts from established
                      protocols. The metrics characterising perfusion did not
                      correlate with their canonical counterparts, which suggests
                      in part that these reflect different phenomena. Conversely,
                      the Gaussian and non-Gaussian quantities proposed were
                      highly correlated with those from the canonic protocols,
                      indicating that the clinical usefulness of the canonic
                      quantities is preserved when using the proposed metrics. The
                      second method is based on a parameter-free fitting of dMRI
                      data with b-values ranging up to 10,000 s/mm2, using
                      non-negative least squares. This method provides with a
                      diffusivity spectrum, as opposed to a fixed set of
                      diffusivity pools and their relative fractions, allowing for
                      a richer characterisation of the different diffusivity
                      regimes in the tissue. Data was also fitted using
                      established methods such as mono-, bi-, and tri-exponential
                      decays in order to establish the added value of the proposed
                      method. This method was demonstrated in a broad brain tumour
                      cohort, where tissue specific spectra were derived: grey
                      matter, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid, oedema, tumour,
                      and restricted diffusion lesions. The latter develops as a
                      consequence of the disease but it is yet poorly understood.
                      The proposed method is applied to try to characterise this
                      lesion. The suggested method was shown to better fit the
                      data than the fixed-term models and the derived spectra show
                      distinct differences in both healthy and pathologic tissue.
                      In conclusion, this work developed methods for the
                      multi-parametric characterisation of diffusion in biological
                      tissues, evaluated in brain tumour patients.},
      cin          = {535000-5 ; 934010},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)535000-5_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      doi          = {10.18154/RWTH-2025-06232},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/1015160},
}