% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Rieken:1023729,
author = {Rieken, Niklas},
othercontributors = {Peis, Britta and Kittsteiner, Thomas},
title = {{M}atroid optimization in auction theory},
school = {Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen},
type = {Dissertation},
address = {Aachen},
publisher = {RWTH Aachen University},
reportid = {RWTH-2025-10701},
pages = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen},
year = {2025},
note = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen
University; Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische
Hochschule Aachen, 2025},
abstract = {This thesis is mainly concerned with the theory of dynamic
multi-item auctions, i.e., a processes in which, over time,
there is communication between buyers and an auctioneer, who
adjusts prices for the items based on that communication.
There is a vast number of intriguing questions on those
processes, both from an economic and a computational point
of view. A Walrasian equilibrium—characterized by a price
vector and an allocation of goods such that all agents
maximize utility and the market clears—represents a
central concept in general equilibrium theory. It is
well-known that Walrasian equilibria are guaranteed to exist
if all buyers have gross substitute valuation functions.
Finding these equilibria by means of natural dynamic
auctions (or tâtonnement) poses an interesting
computational problem—finding excess demand sets to
increase prices on—that previously involved submodular
function minimization, which is a highly non-trivial
process. We show that this process can be simplified in
cognitive complexity and running time. This can either be
achieved by very easy maximum flow computations if the
valuation functions are simple enough, or by solving a
polymatroid sum problem if we want to handle arbitrary gross
substitute valuations. In both cases, the corresponding dual
solution reveals the desired excess demand set. We also
prove some structural properties about Walrasian prices
(which form a lattice) and their relation to weaker notions
of market equilibria. Our results bridge theoretical
economics and algorithmic mechanism design, offering both a
novel computational perspective and practical auction
protocols to find equilibria. For a related ascending
auction, to sell a base of a matroid, we show that its
analysis can be simplified by using only a few folklore
lemmas from matroid theory. This auction has the neat
property that acting truthfully as a buyer is an equilibrium
strategy—a feature that is typically not present in
dynamic multi-item auctions with buyers having valuations
that are not unit-demand; moreover, the auctions also output
(under truthful signals) the utilitarian optimum, i.e., a
matroid base of maximum weight. We also give additional
remarks regarding communication cost and privacy matters of
this auction. Finally, we study a natural extension of a
greedy algorithm for submodular covering problems, which
allows to remove previously chosen elements if they are
recognized to be redundant. We are able to show that for
this greedy algorithm natural subclass of submodular
functions exhibits neat properties that can be seen as
generalizations for properties of matroid rank functions.
For some of these functions, we can show that the algorithm
is guaranteed to compute an optimal solution to the
submodular covering problem given any linear cost function.},
cin = {815110},
ddc = {330},
cid = {$I:(DE-82)815110_20140620$},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
doi = {10.18154/RWTH-2025-10701},
url = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/1023729},
}