filteredData<-processedData
##VP exclusion
n_all<-nrow(filteredData)
#consent
filteredData<-filteredData%>%filter(DSE_DS1=="Y"&DSE_DS2=="Y"&DSE_DS3=="Y"&DSE_DS4=="Y"&DSE_DS5=="Y")
n_excl_con<-n_all-nrow(filteredData)
#age
filteredData<-filteredData%>%filter(Age>=18&Age<=200)
n_excl_age<-(n_all-n_excl_con)-nrow(filteredData)
##overview
filteredData %>% select("EFInfo_EFHer","EFInfo_EFRec","EF_WTP","EF_PEVMean","EF_PFRMean","EF_Choice","Age","Gender","Prior_knowledge","UB_Mean","UBaff_Mean","UBkog_Mean","UBkon_Mean","interviewtime","time", "Confidence") %>% summary()
## EFInfo_EFHer EFInfo_EFRec EF_WTP EF_PEVMean EF_PFRMean
## Min. :1.000 Min. :3.000 Min. : 554 Min. :3.250 Min. :1.000
## 1st Qu.:2.000 1st Qu.:6.000 1st Qu.:1000 1st Qu.:5.500 1st Qu.:2.000
## Median :4.000 Median :7.000 Median :1109 Median :6.000 Median :2.500
## Mean :4.072 Mean :6.133 Mean :1119 Mean :5.895 Mean :2.563
## 3rd Qu.:5.500 3rd Qu.:7.000 3rd Qu.:1276 3rd Qu.:6.500 3rd Qu.:3.250
## Max. :7.000 Max. :7.000 Max. :2000 Max. :7.000 Max. :5.500
## EF_Choice Age Gender Prior_knowledge
## Min. :1.000 Min. :18 male : 7 no prior knowledge :80
## 1st Qu.:2.000 1st Qu.:19 female :75 limited prior knowledge : 3
## Median :2.000 Median :21 diverse : 1 extensive prior knowledge: 0
## Mean :1.819 Mean :21 no_Answer: 0
## 3rd Qu.:2.000 3rd Qu.:22
## Max. :2.000 Max. :31
## UB_Mean UBaff_Mean UBkog_Mean UBkon_Mean
## Min. :1.667 Min. :1.667 Min. :2.333 Min. :1.000
## 1st Qu.:3.667 1st Qu.:3.667 1st Qu.:3.667 1st Qu.:3.333
## Median :4.111 Median :4.333 Median :4.333 Median :3.667
## Mean :4.024 Mean :4.116 Mean :4.185 Mean :3.771
## 3rd Qu.:4.444 3rd Qu.:4.667 3rd Qu.:4.667 3rd Qu.:4.333
## Max. :5.000 Max. :5.000 Max. :5.000 Max. :5.000
## interviewtime time Confidence
## Min. : 332.4 Min. : 5.54 Min. :1.000
## 1st Qu.: 656.4 1st Qu.:10.94 1st Qu.:2.000
## Median : 787.1 Median :13.12 Median :3.000
## Mean : 865.2 Mean :14.42 Mean :3.602
## 3rd Qu.: 966.2 3rd Qu.:16.10 3rd Qu.:5.000
## Max. :2393.9 Max. :39.90 Max. :7.000
filteredData %>% select("Age","EF_WTP","EF_PEVMean","EF_PFRMean")%>%describe()
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range
## Age 1 83 21.00 2.60 21.0 20.57 1.48 18.00 31.0 13.00
## EF_WTP 2 83 1119.04 258.53 1109.0 1123.04 163.09 554.00 2000.0 1446.00
## EF_PEVMean 3 83 5.89 0.84 6.0 5.97 0.74 3.25 7.0 3.75
## EF_PFRMean 4 83 2.56 1.10 2.5 2.49 1.11 1.00 5.5 4.50
## skew kurtosis se
## Age 1.79 3.64 0.29
## EF_WTP 0.13 0.61 28.38
## EF_PEVMean -0.75 0.29 0.09
## EF_PFRMean 0.50 -0.29 0.12
###scale reliabilities: raw_alpha = Cronbach's alpha
UBaff_Mean<-select(filteredData,Umweltbewusstsein_UBaff1:Umweltbewusstsein_UBaff3)
scale_reli<-psych::alpha(UBaff_Mean)$total
UBkog_Mean<-select(filteredData,Umweltbewusstsein_UBkog1:Umweltbewusstsein_UBkog3)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(UBkog_Mean)$total)
UBkon_Mean<-select(filteredData,Umweltbewusstsein_UBkon1:Umweltbewusstsein_UBkon3)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(UBkon_Mean)$total)
UB_Mean<-select(filteredData,Umweltbewusstsein_UBaff1:Umweltbewusstsein_UBkon3)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(UB_Mean)$total)
EF_PEVMean<-select(filteredData,EFPEV_EFPEV1:EFPEV_EFPEV4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(EF_PEVMean)$total)
EF_PFRMean<-select(filteredData,EFPFR_EFPFR1:EFPFR_EFPFR4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(EF_PFRMean)$total)
Sz1_PEVMean<-select(filteredData,Sz1PEV_Sz1PEV1:Sz1PEV_Sz1PEV4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz1_PEVMean)$total)
Sz1_PFRMean<-select(filteredData,Sz1PFR_Sz1PFR1:Sz1PFR_Sz1PFR4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz1_PFRMean)$total)
Sz2_PEVMean<-select(filteredData,Sz2PEV_Sz2PEV1:Sz2PEV_Sz2PEV4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz2_PEVMean)$total)
Sz2_PFRMean<-select(filteredData,Sz2PFR_Sz2PFR1:Sz2PFR_Sz2PFR4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz2_PFRMean)$total)
Sz3_PEVMean<-select(filteredData,Sz3PEV_Sz3PEV1:Sz3PEV_Sz3PEV4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz3_PEVMean)$total)
Sz3_PFRMean<-select(filteredData,Sz3PFR_Sz3PFR1:Sz3PFR_Sz3PFR4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz3_PFRMean)$total)
Sz4_PEVMean<-select(filteredData,Sz4PEV_Sz4PEV1:Sz4PEV_Sz4PEV4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz4_PEVMean)$total)
Sz4_PFRMean<-select(filteredData,Sz4PFR_Sz4PFR1:Sz4PFR_Sz4PFR4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz4_PFRMean)$total)
Sz5_PEVMean<-select(filteredData,Sz5PEV_Sz5PEV1:Sz5PEV_Sz5PEV4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz5_PEVMean)$total)
Sz5_PFRMean<-select(filteredData,Sz5PFR_Sz5PFR1:Sz5PFR_Sz5PFR4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz5_PFRMean)$total)
Sz6_PEVMean<-select(filteredData,Sz6PEV_Sz6PEV1:Sz6PEV_Sz6PEV4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz6_PEVMean)$total)
Sz6_PFRMean<-select(filteredData,Sz6PFR_Sz6PFR1:Sz6PFR_Sz6PFR4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz6_PFRMean)$total)
Sz7_PEVMean<-select(filteredData,Sz7PEV_Sz7PEV1:Sz7PEV_Sz7PEV4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz7_PEVMean)$total)
Sz7_PFRMean<-select(filteredData,Sz7PFR_Sz7PFR1:Sz7PFR_Sz7PFR4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz7_PFRMean)$total)
Sz8_PEVMean<-select(filteredData,Sz8PEV_Sz8PEV1:Sz8PEV_Sz8PEV4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz8_PEVMean)$total)
Sz8_PFRMean<-select(filteredData,Sz8PFR_Sz8PFR1:Sz8PFR_Sz8PFR4)
scale_reli<-rbind(scale_reli,psych::alpha(Sz8_PFRMean)$total)
scale_reli<-cbind(Scale=c("UBaff_Mean","UBkog_Mean","UBkon_Mean","UB_Mean","EF_PEVMean","EF_PFRMean","Sz1_PEVMean","Sz1_PFRMean","Sz2_PEVMean","Sz2_PFRMean","Sz3_PEVMean","Sz3_PFRMean","Sz4_PEVMean","Sz4_PFRMean","Sz5_PEVMean","Sz5_PFRMean","Sz6_PEVMean","Sz6_PFRMean","Sz7_PEVMean","Sz7_PFRMean","Sz8_PEVMean","Sz8_PFRMean"),scale_reli)
scale_reli
## Scale raw_alpha std.alpha G6(smc) average_r S/N ase
## UBaff_Mean 0.7405063 0.7463002 0.6711080 0.4950912 2.9416666 0.047385685
## 1 UBkog_Mean 0.4876243 0.4920832 0.4069853 0.2441091 0.9688266 0.098054723
## 2 UBkon_Mean 0.6849801 0.6858057 0.5932979 0.4211560 2.1827437 0.059903609
## 3 UB_Mean 0.8297030 0.8300242 0.8358992 0.3517340 4.8831908 0.027720322
## 4 EF_PEVMean 0.7483056 0.7657887 0.7773307 0.4497670 3.2696479 0.045030478
## 5 EF_PFRMean 0.8699542 0.8745620 0.8534184 0.6354379 6.9720679 0.023426177
## 6 Sz1_PEVMean 0.9091208 0.9111473 0.8955784 0.7193886 10.2545869 0.016642459
## 7 Sz1_PFRMean 0.9234355 0.9264903 0.9222333 0.7590891 12.6036483 0.014549013
## 8 Sz2_PEVMean 0.8966461 0.8998599 0.8839071 0.6919762 8.9860106 0.018962736
## 9 Sz2_PFRMean 0.9004305 0.9119979 0.9033202 0.7215137 10.3633652 0.018889503
## 10 Sz3_PEVMean 0.9163454 0.9163621 0.9099280 0.7325542 10.9563000 0.015324576
## 11 Sz3_PFRMean 0.9188248 0.9205471 0.9250637 0.7433605 11.5860679 0.015266376
## 12 Sz4_PEVMean 0.9266583 0.9259707 0.9232696 0.7576958 12.5081737 0.013252063
## 13 Sz4_PFRMean 0.8943005 0.8967299 0.8978592 0.6846257 8.6833424 0.019755189
## 14 Sz5_PEVMean 0.9112713 0.9119410 0.9087840 0.7213713 10.3560226 0.016099052
## 15 Sz5_PFRMean 0.8646672 0.8712090 0.8841077 0.6284089 6.7645199 0.026028759
## 16 Sz6_PEVMean 0.9244455 0.9250499 0.9224830 0.7552350 12.3422047 0.014042473
## 17 Sz6_PFRMean 0.8952959 0.9019323 0.8983536 0.6969017 9.1970377 0.020349819
## 18 Sz7_PEVMean 0.9582235 0.9584649 0.9583986 0.8522680 23.0760499 0.007772836
## 19 Sz7_PFRMean 0.9013558 0.9018831 0.9005003 0.6967841 9.1919224 0.018268407
## 20 Sz8_PEVMean 0.9423222 0.9434869 0.9355430 0.8067166 16.6950049 0.010454419
## 21 Sz8_PFRMean 0.8558373 0.8654570 0.8605967 0.6165852 6.4325655 0.027176596
## mean sd median_r
## 4.116466 0.7868047 0.5192685
## 1 4.184739 0.6507303 0.2931987
## 2 3.771084 0.7305337 0.4244829
## 3 4.024096 0.6135203 0.3554926
## 4 5.894578 0.8447475 0.3799512
## 5 2.563253 1.0986712 0.6390993
## 6 5.156627 1.2516519 0.7017560
## 7 2.996988 1.2448026 0.7554914
## 8 5.132530 1.1623786 0.6672624
## 9 2.521084 1.0368256 0.7112624
## 10 4.228916 1.4213125 0.7255262
## 11 3.015060 1.2785456 0.7590525
## 12 3.972892 1.5191923 0.7748283
## 13 2.515060 1.0478996 0.6929356
## 14 3.439759 1.4337984 0.7169903
## 15 2.743976 1.1008422 0.6540761
## 16 3.484940 1.5047432 0.7535688
## 17 2.334337 1.0522023 0.7028599
## 18 2.195783 1.2210353 0.8540406
## 19 2.617470 1.2330172 0.6964924
## 20 2.376506 1.2465645 0.7987268
## 21 2.286145 1.0353011 0.6303157
##sample description
n_incl<-nrow(filteredData)
descr_age<-describe(filteredData$Age)
descr_age
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 21 2.6 21 20.57 1.48 18 31 13 1.79 3.64 0.29
descr_gender <- filteredData %>% count(Gender)
descr_gender
## # A tibble: 3 × 2
## Gender n
## <fct> <int>
## 1 male 7
## 2 female 75
## 3 diverse 1
descr_fem<-(descr_gender[2,"n"]/n_incl)*100
descr_Prior_knowledge <- filteredData %>% count(Prior_knowledge)
descr_Prior_knowledge
## # A tibble: 2 × 2
## Prior_knowledge n
## <fct> <int>
## 1 no prior knowledge 80
## 2 limited prior knowledge 3
descr_noVW <- (descr_Prior_knowledge[1,"n"]/n_incl)*100
descr_partVW <- (descr_Prior_knowledge[2,"n"]/n_incl)*100
descr_lotVW <- (descr_Prior_knowledge[3,"n"]/n_incl)*100
#variable description
descr_UB<-describe(filteredData$UB_Mean)
descr_UB
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 4.02 0.61 4.11 4.07 0.66 1.67 5 3.33 -0.87 1.4 0.07
descr_time <- describe(filteredData$time)
descr_time
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 14.42 6.11 13.12 13.63 4.04 5.54 39.9 34.36 1.88 4.93 0.67
#confidence
descr_Con<-describe(filteredData$Confidence)
descr_Con
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 3.6 1.69 3 3.52 1.48 1 7 6 0.37 -0.82 0.19
After exclusion of non-viable answers, data of 83 participants (90.36 % female, M (age) = 21, SD (age) = 2.6) was analyzed. Overall, 96.39% of participants did not have prior knowledge of the construction industry, 3.61% had limited prior knowledge and NA% had extensive prior knowledge of topics related to the construction industry. The mean environmental consciousness was high, with M = 4.02 (SD = 0.61) out of five. For the second part of the study, participants indicated a mean confidence in their answers of M = 3.6 (SD = 1.69) out of 7. Participants spend an average of M = 14.42 minutes with the entire study (SD = 6.11 minutes).There was no monetary compensation, but psychology students had the option to gain course credit for their participation.
#Interest in additional information
describe(filteredData$EFInfo_EFHer)
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 4.07 1.88 4 4.09 2.97 1 7 6 -0.05 -1.18 0.21
describe(filteredData$EFInfo_EFRec)
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 6.13 1.11 7 6.33 0 3 7 4 -1.26 0.87 0.12
#Mean Perceived Environmental Value over all eight scenarios per item
filteredData$PEVMean1<-rowMeans(subset(filteredData,select=c("Sz1PEV_Sz1PEV1","Sz2PEV_Sz2PEV1","Sz3PEV_Sz3PEV1","Sz4PEV_Sz4PEV1","Sz5PEV_Sz5PEV1","Sz6PEV_Sz6PEV1","Sz7PEV_Sz7PEV1","Sz8PEV_Sz8PEV1")))
filteredData$PEVMean2<-rowMeans(subset(filteredData,select=c("Sz1PEV_Sz1PEV2","Sz2PEV_Sz2PEV2","Sz3PEV_Sz3PEV2","Sz4PEV_Sz4PEV2","Sz5PEV_Sz5PEV2","Sz6PEV_Sz6PEV2","Sz7PEV_Sz7PEV2","Sz8PEV_Sz8PEV2")))
filteredData$PEVMean3<-rowMeans(subset(filteredData,select=c("Sz1PEV_Sz1PEV3","Sz2PEV_Sz2PEV3","Sz3PEV_Sz3PEV3","Sz4PEV_Sz4PEV3","Sz5PEV_Sz5PEV3","Sz6PEV_Sz6PEV3","Sz7PEV_Sz7PEV3","Sz8PEV_Sz8PEV3")))
filteredData$PEVMean4<-rowMeans(subset(filteredData,select=c("Sz1PEV_Sz1PEV4","Sz2PEV_Sz2PEV4","Sz3PEV_Sz3PEV4","Sz4PEV_Sz4PEV4","Sz5PEV_Sz5PEV4","Sz6PEV_Sz6PEV4","Sz7PEV_Sz7PEV4","Sz8PEV_Sz8PEV4")))
#Mean Perceived Functional Risk over all eight scenarios per item
filteredData$PFRMean1<-rowMeans(subset(filteredData,select=c("Sz1PFR_Sz1PFR1","Sz2PFR_Sz2PFR1","Sz3PFR_Sz3PFR1","Sz4PFR_Sz4PFR1","Sz5PFR_Sz5PFR1","Sz6PFR_Sz6PFR1","Sz7PFR_Sz7PFR1","Sz8PFR_Sz8PFR1")))
filteredData$PFRMean2<-rowMeans(subset(filteredData,select=c("Sz1PFR_Sz1PFR2","Sz2PFR_Sz2PFR2","Sz3PFR_Sz3PFR2","Sz4PFR_Sz4PFR2","Sz5PFR_Sz5PFR2","Sz6PFR_Sz6PFR2","Sz7PFR_Sz7PFR2","Sz8PFR_Sz8PFR2")))
filteredData$PFRMean3<-rowMeans(subset(filteredData,select=c("Sz1PFR_Sz1PFR3","Sz2PFR_Sz2PFR3","Sz3PFR_Sz3PFR3","Sz4PFR_Sz4PFR3","Sz5PFR_Sz5PFR3","Sz6PFR_Sz6PFR3","Sz7PFR_Sz7PFR3","Sz8PFR_Sz8PFR3")))
filteredData$PFRMean4<-rowMeans(subset(filteredData,select=c("Sz1PFR_Sz1PFR4","Sz2PFR_Sz2PFR4","Sz3PFR_Sz3PFR4","Sz4PFR_Sz4PFR4","Sz5PFR_Sz5PFR4","Sz6PFR_Sz6PFR4","Sz7PFR_Sz7PFR4","Sz8PFR_Sz8PFR4")))
#Means over all eight scenarios over all items
filteredData$PEVAllMean<-rowMeans(subset(filteredData,select=Sz1_PEVMean:Sz8_PEVMean))
filteredData$PFRAllMean<-rowMeans(subset(filteredData,select=Sz1_PFRMean:Sz8_PFRMean))
filteredData$WTPAll<-rowMeans(subset(filteredData,select=Sz1_WTP:Sz8_WTP))
filteredData$PrefAll<-rowMeans(subset(filteredData,select=Sz1_Pref:Sz8_Pref))
#give statistics
filteredData %>% select("PEVMean1":"PrefAll") %>% describe()
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range
## PEVMean1 1 83 3.80 0.83 3.75 3.82 0.74 1.75 5.62 3.88
## PEVMean2 2 83 3.75 0.75 3.75 3.74 0.74 1.88 5.62 3.75
## PEVMean3 3 83 3.65 0.89 3.75 3.71 0.74 1.00 5.38 4.38
## PEVMean4 4 83 3.79 0.82 3.88 3.79 0.74 1.75 6.00 4.25
## PFRMean1 5 83 2.58 0.92 2.50 2.56 1.11 1.00 4.75 3.75
## PFRMean2 6 83 2.49 0.90 2.38 2.46 0.93 1.00 4.38 3.38
## PFRMean3 7 83 2.56 0.85 2.50 2.55 0.93 1.00 4.25 3.25
## PFRMean4 8 83 2.88 1.04 2.75 2.81 1.11 1.00 7.00 6.00
## PEVAllMean 9 83 3.75 0.76 3.78 3.76 0.65 1.75 5.59 3.84
## PFRAllMean 10 83 2.63 0.81 2.50 2.62 0.83 1.06 4.22 3.16
## WTPAll 11 83 970.81 150.47 981.25 973.72 133.80 526.62 1345.75 819.12
## PrefAll 12 83 3.15 0.55 3.20 3.16 0.49 1.58 4.42 2.84
## skew kurtosis se
## PEVMean1 -0.23 0.17 0.09
## PEVMean2 0.06 0.13 0.08
## PEVMean3 -0.56 0.34 0.10
## PEVMean4 0.06 0.28 0.09
## PFRMean1 0.12 -0.92 0.10
## PFRMean2 0.28 -0.92 0.10
## PFRMean3 0.17 -0.78 0.09
## PFRMean4 0.95 1.76 0.11
## PEVAllMean -0.12 0.22 0.08
## PFRAllMean 0.18 -0.90 0.09
## WTPAll -0.22 0.38 16.52
## PrefAll -0.23 -0.03 0.06
#clean data frame
filteredData<-select(filteredData,-c("EFPEV_EFPEV1":"EFPFR_EFPFR4","Sz1PEV_Sz1PEV1":"Sz1PFR_Sz1PFR4","Sz2PEV_Sz2PEV1":"Sz2PFR_Sz2PFR4","Sz3PEV_Sz3PEV1":"Sz3PFR_Sz3PFR4","Sz4PEV_Sz4PEV1":"Sz4PFR_Sz4PFR4","Sz5PEV_Sz5PEV1":"Sz5PFR_Sz5PFR4","Sz6PEV_Sz6PEV1":"Sz6PFR_Sz6PFR4","Sz7PEV_Sz7PEV1":"Sz7PFR_Sz7PFR4","Sz8PEV_Sz8PEV1":"Sz8PFR_Sz8PFR4","Umweltbewusstsein_UBaff1":"Umweltbewusstsein_UBkon3","groupTime2675":"AbschlussTime","PEVMean1","PEVMean2","PEVMean3","PEVMean4","PFRMean1","PFRMean2","PFRMean3","PFRMean4"))
##interest in additional information
# create data frame in long format
filteredData_EFlong <- filteredData %>% pivot_longer(
cols = EFInfo_EFHer:EFInfo_EFRec,
names_to="EF_Material",
names_pattern = "_EF(.*)",
values_to="EF_Interest"
)
#create new factor for Material
filteredData_EFlong$EF_Material<-factor(filteredData_EFlong$EF_Material,levels=c("Her","Rec"))
#Visualize the interest in additional information depending of the material
boxplot(EF_Interest~EF_Material,filteredData_EFlong,
xlab = "Material", ylab="Interest", names=c("NAC","RAC"))
#interest in additional info
descr_intNAC<-describe(filteredData$EFInfo_EFHer)
descr_intNAC
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 4.07 1.88 4 4.09 2.97 1 7 6 -0.05 -1.18 0.21
descr_intRAC<-describe(filteredData$EFInfo_EFRec)
descr_intRAC
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 6.13 1.11 7 6.33 0 3 7 4 -1.26 0.87 0.12
#choice
descr_choice<-filteredData %>% count(EF_Choice)
descr_choice
## # A tibble: 2 × 2
## EF_Choice n
## <dbl> <int>
## 1 1 15
## 2 2 68
num_NAC<-descr_choice[1,"n"]
num_RAC<-descr_choice[2,"n"]
#rating of RAC element
RAC_WTP<-describe(filteredData$EF_WTP)
RAC_WTP
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis
## X1 1 83 1119.04 258.53 1109 1123.04 163.09 554 2000 1446 0.13 0.61
## se
## X1 28.38
RAC_PEV<-describe(filteredData$EF_PEVMean)
RAC_PEV
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 5.89 0.84 6 5.97 0.74 3.25 7 3.75 -0.75 0.29 0.09
RAC_PFR<-describe(filteredData$EF_PFRMean)
RAC_PFR
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 2.56 1.1 2.5 2.49 1.11 1 5.5 4.5 0.5 -0.29 0.12
#comparing willingness to pay with default value of 1000
t_EF_ZB<-t.test(filteredData$EF_WTP, mu = 1000)
#comparison between conventional and recycled concrete
t_interest<-t.test(filteredData$EFInfo_EFHer, filteredData$EFInfo_EFRec, paired=TRUE)
t_interest
##
## Paired t-test
##
## data: filteredData$EFInfo_EFHer and filteredData$EFInfo_EFRec
## t = -9.8344, df = 82, p-value = 1.587e-15
## alternative hypothesis: true mean difference is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -2.476990 -1.643491
## sample estimates:
## mean difference
## -2.060241
prop_choice<-prop.test(c(num_NAC$n,num_RAC$n),c(n_incl,n_incl))
prop_choice
##
## 2-sample test for equality of proportions with continuity correction
##
## data: c(num_NAC$n, num_RAC$n) out of c(n_incl, n_incl)
## X-squared = 65.157, df = 1, p-value = 6.918e-16
## alternative hypothesis: two.sided
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.7676725 -0.5094359
## sample estimates:
## prop 1 prop 2
## 0.1807229 0.8192771
library("pwr")
ES.h(p1=num_RAC$n/n_incl,p2=num_NAC$n/n_incl)
## [1] 1.385236
For the rating of a RAC stairway element without additional information, participants were willing to pay a mean of M = 1119.04 € (SD = 258.53), which did significantly differ from the default value of 1000 € provided for NAC elements, t(82) = 4.19, p = 0. The mean perceived environmental value was rated high, with M = 5.89 out of seven, and the mean perceived functional risk was rated low, with M = 2.56 out of seven.
Generally, participants were interested in additional information, but more so for the recycled aggregate concrete (RAC; M = 6.13) compared to the natural aggregate concrete (NAC; M = 4.07), as shown by a significant t-test, t(82) = -9.83, p = 0. Additionally, more participants chose the stairway element made of RAC (81.93%) than the stairway element made of NAC (18.07%), X2(1) = 65.16, p = 0.
##analysis of attributes
attributeData<-filteredData %>% select(Att1_SQ001:Att5_SQ003)
Att_Items<-colSums(attributeData, na.rm=TRUE)
attributeData<-rbind(attributeData,Att_Items)
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att1_SQ001"] <- "Product identifier "
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att1_SQ002"] <- "Product description"
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att1_SQ003"] <- "Manufacturing description"
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att1_SQ004"] <- "Supply chain traceability"
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att2_SQ001"] <- "Concrete Composition "
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att2_SQ002"] <- "Type of concrete aggregates "
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att2_SQ003"] <- "Reinforcement"
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att2_SQ004"] <- "Hazardous materials "
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att3_SQ001"] <- "Global Warming Potential "
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att3_SQ002"] <- "Energy Consumption "
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att3_SQ003"] <- "Resource depletion"
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att3_SQ004"] <- "Air Pollution"
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att3_SQ005"] <- "Land Use"
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att3_SQ006"] <- "Eutrophication Potential "
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att3_SQ007"] <- "Ozone Depletion Potential"
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att3_SQ008"] <- "Acidification Potential"
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att4_SQ001"] <- "Material properties "
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att4_SQ002"] <- "Structural Performance"
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att4_SQ003"] <- "Fatigue Resistance"
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att4_SQ004"] <- "Fire Resistance"
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att4_SQ005"] <- "Durability Metrics "
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att5_SQ001"] <- "Reuse Potential "
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att5_SQ002"] <- "Disassembly instructions "
names(Att_Items)[names(Att_Items)=="Att5_SQ003"] <- "Waste management recommendations"
Att_Items<-Att_Items[order(Att_Items, decreasing=TRUE)]
Att_Items<-(Att_Items/n_incl)*100
Att_Items<-as.data.frame(Att_Items)
Att_sum<-(rowSums(attributeData[(n_incl+1),c("Att1_SQ001","Att1_SQ002","Att1_SQ003","Att1_SQ004") ],na.rm=TRUE))/4
Att_sum<-rbind(Att_sum,(rowSums(attributeData[(n_incl+1),c("Att2_SQ001","Att2_SQ002","Att2_SQ003","Att2_SQ004") ],na.rm=TRUE))/4)
Att_sum<-rbind(Att_sum,(rowSums(attributeData[(n_incl+1),c("Att3_SQ001","Att3_SQ002","Att3_SQ003","Att3_SQ004","Att3_SQ005","Att3_SQ006","Att3_SQ007","Att3_SQ008") ],na.rm=TRUE))/8)
Att_sum<-rbind(Att_sum,(rowSums(attributeData[(n_incl+1),c("Att4_SQ001","Att4_SQ002","Att4_SQ003","Att4_SQ004","Att4_SQ005") ],na.rm=TRUE))/5)
Att_sum<-rbind(Att_sum,(rowSums(attributeData[(n_incl+1),c("Att5_SQ001","Att5_SQ002","Att5_SQ003") ],na.rm=TRUE))/3)
Attribute<-data.frame(Attribute=c("Product Identification","Material Composition","Environmental Impact","Performance and Safety","Circularity and End-Of-Life"),chosen=Att_sum)
knitr::kable(Att_Items,caption="Attribute")
| Att_Items | |
|---|---|
| Hazardous materials | 97.59036 |
| Structural Performance | 95.18072 |
| Manufacturing description | 92.77108 |
| Material properties | 91.56627 |
| Product description | 90.36145 |
| Durability Metrics | 87.95181 |
| Concrete Composition | 86.74699 |
| Energy Consumption | 86.74699 |
| Resource depletion | 86.74699 |
| Supply chain traceability | 77.10843 |
| Global Warming Potential | 74.69880 |
| Fatigue Resistance | 74.69880 |
| Reuse Potential | 73.49398 |
| Fire Resistance | 72.28916 |
| Air Pollution | 69.87952 |
| Disassembly instructions | 68.67470 |
| Reinforcement | 60.24096 |
| Waste management recommendations | 59.03614 |
| Land Use | 31.32530 |
| Type of concrete aggregates | 27.71084 |
| Acidification Potential | 27.71084 |
| Product identifier | 25.30120 |
| Ozone Depletion Potential | 21.68675 |
| Eutrophication Potential | 16.86747 |
knitr::kable(Attribute,caption="Attribute-categories")
| Attribute | chosen | |
|---|---|---|
| Att_sum | Product Identification | 59.25000 |
| X | Material Composition | 56.50000 |
| X.1 | Environmental Impact | 43.12500 |
| X.2 | Performance and Safety | 70.00000 |
| X.3 | Circularity and End-Of-Life | 55.66667 |
###vignettes
##rename for pivoting
#Sz1: RAC_lowENV_lowSTR
#Sz2: RAC_lowENV_highSTR
#Sz3: RAC_highENV_lowSTR
#Sz4: RAC_highENV_highSTR
#Sz5: NAC_lowENV_lowSTR
#Sz6: NAC_lowENV_highSTR
#Sz7: NAC_highENV_lowSTR
#Sz8: NAC_highENV_highSTR
colnames(filteredData)<- gsub("Sz1", "RAC_lowENV_lowSTR", colnames(filteredData))
colnames(filteredData)<- gsub("Sz2", "RAC_lowENV_highSTR", colnames(filteredData))
colnames(filteredData)<- gsub("Sz3", "RAC_highENV_lowSTR", colnames(filteredData))
colnames(filteredData)<- gsub("Sz4", "RAC_highENV_highSTR", colnames(filteredData))
colnames(filteredData)<- gsub("Sz5", "NAC_lowENV_lowSTR", colnames(filteredData))
colnames(filteredData)<- gsub("Sz6", "NAC_lowENV_highSTR", colnames(filteredData))
colnames(filteredData)<- gsub("Sz7", "NAC_highENV_lowSTR", colnames(filteredData))
colnames(filteredData)<- gsub("Sz8", "NAC_highENV_highSTR", colnames(filteredData))
##data processing into long format for ANOVAs
filteredData_long <- filteredData %>% pivot_longer(
cols = RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean:NAC_highENV_highSTR_Pref,
names_to=c("Material","EnvironmentalImpact","StructuralPerformance", ".value"),
names_pattern = "(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)"
)
#recode factors into factors
filteredData_long$Material<-factor(filteredData_long$Material,levels=c("RAC","NAC"))
filteredData_long$EnvironmentalImpact<-factor(filteredData_long$EnvironmentalImpact,levels=c("lowENV","highENV"))
filteredData_long$StructuralPerformance<-factor(filteredData_long$StructuralPerformance,levels=c("lowSTR","highSTR"))
filteredData_RAC_long<-filteredData_long%>%filter(Material=="RAC")
filteredData_NAC_long<-filteredData_long%>%filter(Material=="NAC")
### environmental value
bplot_PEV<-ggplot(filteredData_long, aes(Material, PEVMean, fill = EnvironmentalImpact)) + geom_boxplot() + labs(x = "Material", y = "Perceived Environmental Value") + scale_x_discrete(labels=c("RAC","NAC")) + scale_fill_hue(labels=c("lowENV","highENV"))
bplot_PEV
bplot_RAC_PEV<-ggplot(filteredData_RAC_long, aes(EnvironmentalImpact, PEVMean, fill = StructuralPerformance)) + geom_boxplot() + labs(x = "Environmental Impact", y = "Perceived Environmental Value")+ ggtitle ("Environmental value RAC") + scale_x_discrete(labels=c("low Impact","high Impact")) + scale_fill_hue(labels=c("low Structural Performance","high Structural Performance"))
bplot_NAC_PEV<-ggplot(filteredData_NAC_long, aes(EnvironmentalImpact, PEVMean, fill = StructuralPerformance)) + geom_boxplot() + labs(x = "EnvImpact", y = "Perceived Environmental Value")+ ggtitle ("Environmental value NAC") + scale_x_discrete(labels=c("low Impact","high Impact")) + scale_fill_hue(labels=c("low structural performance","high structural performance"))
### risk perception
bplot_PFR<-ggplot(filteredData_long, aes(Material, PFRMean, fill = StructuralPerformance)) + geom_boxplot() + labs(x = "Material", y = "Perceived Risk") + scale_x_discrete(labels=c("RAC","NAC")) + scale_fill_hue(labels=c("low STR","high STR"))
bplot_PFR
bplot_RAC_PFR<-ggplot(filteredData_RAC_long, aes(EnvironmentalImpact, PFRMean, fill = StructuralPerformance)) + geom_boxplot() + labs(x = "Environmental Impact", y = "Perceived Rsik") + ggtitle ("Functional risk RAC") + scale_x_discrete(labels=c("low Impact","high Impact")) + scale_fill_hue(labels=c("low structural performance","high structural performance"))
bplot_NAC_PFR<-ggplot(filteredData_NAC_long, aes(EnvironmentalImpact, PFRMean, fill = StructuralPerformance)) + geom_boxplot() + labs(x = "Environmental Impact", y = "Perceived Rsik") + ggtitle ("Functional risk NAC") + scale_x_discrete(labels=c("low Impact","high Impact")) + scale_fill_hue(labels=c("low structural performance","high structural performance"))
grid.arrange(bplot_RAC_PEV,bplot_NAC_PEV,bplot_RAC_PFR,bplot_NAC_PFR,ncol=2, nrow=2)
####willingness to pay
bplot_RAC_WTP<-ggplot(filteredData_RAC_long, aes(EnvironmentalImpact, WTP, fill = StructuralPerformance)) + geom_boxplot() + labs(x = "Environmental Impact", y = "Willigness to pay") + ggtitle ("WTP RAC") + scale_x_discrete(labels=c("low Impact","high Impact")) + scale_fill_manual(values=c("lowSTR"= "#66B3E8","highSTR" = "#005EB8"),labels=c("low structural performance","high structural performance"))
bplot_NAC_WTP<-ggplot(filteredData_NAC_long, aes(EnvironmentalImpact, WTP, fill = StructuralPerformance)) + geom_boxplot() + labs(x = "EnvImpact", y = "Willigness to pay") + ggtitle ("WTP NAC") + scale_x_discrete(labels=c("low Env Impact","high Env Impact")) + scale_fill_manual(values=c("lowSTR"= "#66B3E8","highSTR" = "#005EB8"),labels=c("low structural performance","high structural performance"))
### preference
bplot_RAC_Pref<-ggplot(filteredData_RAC_long, aes(EnvironmentalImpact, Pref, fill = StructuralPerformance)) + geom_boxplot() + labs(x = "Environmental Impact", y = "Preference") + ggtitle ("Preference RAC") + scale_x_discrete(labels=c("low Impact","high Impact")) + scale_fill_manual(values=c("lowSTR"= "#66B3E8","highSTR" = "#005EB8"),labels=c("low structural performance","high structural performance"))
bplot_NAC_Pref<-ggplot(filteredData_NAC_long, aes(EnvironmentalImpact, Pref, fill = StructuralPerformance)) + geom_boxplot() + labs(x = "EnvImpact", y = "Preference") + ggtitle ("Preference NAC") + scale_x_discrete(labels=c("low Env Impact","high Env Impact")) + scale_fill_manual(values=c("lowSTR"= "#66B3E8","highSTR" = "#005EB8"),labels=c("low structural performance","high structural performance"))
grid.arrange(bplot_RAC_WTP,bplot_NAC_WTP,bplot_RAC_Pref,bplot_NAC_Pref,ncol=2, nrow=2)
filteredData %>% select(RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean,RAC_lowENV_highSTR_PEVMean, RAC_highENV_lowSTR_PEVMean,RAC_highENV_highSTR_PEVMean,NAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean,NAC_lowENV_highSTR_PEVMean,NAC_highENV_lowSTR_PEVMean,NAC_highENV_highSTR_PEVMean) %>% describe()
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max
## RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean 1 83 5.16 1.25 5.25 5.26 1.11 1.25 7.00
## RAC_lowENV_highSTR_PEVMean 2 83 5.13 1.16 5.25 5.18 1.11 2.50 7.00
## RAC_highENV_lowSTR_PEVMean 3 83 4.23 1.42 4.25 4.26 1.48 1.00 7.00
## RAC_highENV_highSTR_PEVMean 4 83 3.97 1.52 4.50 4.03 1.48 1.00 7.00
## NAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean 5 83 3.44 1.43 3.25 3.41 1.85 1.00 7.00
## NAC_lowENV_highSTR_PEVMean 6 83 3.48 1.50 3.50 3.45 1.85 1.00 7.00
## NAC_highENV_lowSTR_PEVMean 7 83 2.20 1.22 2.00 2.03 1.48 1.00 5.25
## NAC_highENV_highSTR_PEVMean 8 83 2.38 1.25 2.00 2.23 1.11 1.00 6.00
## range skew kurtosis se
## RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean 5.75 -0.83 0.58 0.14
## RAC_lowENV_highSTR_PEVMean 4.50 -0.35 -0.33 0.13
## RAC_highENV_lowSTR_PEVMean 6.00 -0.14 -0.73 0.16
## RAC_highENV_highSTR_PEVMean 6.00 -0.35 -0.85 0.17
## NAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean 6.00 0.20 -0.63 0.16
## NAC_lowENV_highSTR_PEVMean 6.00 0.16 -0.80 0.17
## NAC_highENV_lowSTR_PEVMean 4.25 0.99 -0.10 0.13
## NAC_highENV_highSTR_PEVMean 5.00 0.86 -0.12 0.14
values_PEV<-mean(filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean)
values_PEV<-rbind(values_PEV,mean(filteredData$RAC_lowENV_highSTR_PEVMean))
values_PEV<-rbind(values_PEV,mean(filteredData$RAC_highENV_lowSTR_PEVMean))
values_PEV<-rbind(values_PEV,mean(filteredData$RAC_highENV_highSTR_PEVMean))
values_PEV<-rbind(values_PEV,mean(filteredData$NAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean))
values_PEV<-rbind(values_PEV,mean(filteredData$NAC_lowENV_highSTR_PEVMean))
values_PEV<-rbind(values_PEV,mean(filteredData$NAC_highENV_lowSTR_PEVMean))
values_PEV<-rbind(values_PEV,mean(filteredData$NAC_highENV_highSTR_PEVMean))
barplot_envir<-data.frame(
kategorien = c("RAC_lowEnv_lowSTR","RAC_lowEnv_highSTR","RAC_highEnv_lowSTR","RAC_highEnv_highSTR","NAC_lowEnv_lowSTR","NAC_lowEnv_highSTR","NAC_highEnv_lowSTR","NAC_highEnv_highSTR"),
Perceived_Environmental_Value = values_PEV
)
ggplot(barplot_envir, aes(x = kategorien, y = Perceived_Environmental_Value)) +
geom_bar(stat = "identity", fill = "#66A3E8")+
labs(title = "Perceived Environmental Value", x = "Scenarios", y = "Perceived Environmental Value")+ coord_flip()+theme_minimal()
filteredData %>% select(RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PFRMean,RAC_lowENV_highSTR_PFRMean, RAC_highENV_lowSTR_PFRMean,RAC_highENV_highSTR_PFRMean,NAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PFRMean,NAC_lowENV_highSTR_PFRMean,NAC_highENV_lowSTR_PFRMean,NAC_highENV_highSTR_PFRMean) %>% describe()
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range
## RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PFRMean 1 83 3.00 1.24 3.00 2.93 1.48 1 6.0 5.0
## RAC_lowENV_highSTR_PFRMean 2 83 2.52 1.04 2.25 2.47 1.11 1 5.0 4.0
## RAC_highENV_lowSTR_PFRMean 3 83 3.02 1.28 3.00 2.96 1.48 1 6.5 5.5
## RAC_highENV_highSTR_PFRMean 4 83 2.52 1.05 2.25 2.45 1.11 1 5.5 4.5
## NAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PFRMean 5 83 2.74 1.10 2.75 2.71 1.11 1 5.5 4.5
## NAC_lowENV_highSTR_PFRMean 6 83 2.33 1.05 2.00 2.26 1.11 1 6.0 5.0
## NAC_highENV_lowSTR_PFRMean 7 83 2.62 1.23 2.25 2.52 1.11 1 6.0 5.0
## NAC_highENV_highSTR_PFRMean 8 83 2.29 1.04 2.00 2.22 1.11 1 4.5 3.5
## skew kurtosis se
## RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PFRMean 0.51 -0.46 0.14
## RAC_lowENV_highSTR_PFRMean 0.55 -0.61 0.11
## RAC_highENV_lowSTR_PFRMean 0.43 -0.35 0.14
## RAC_highENV_highSTR_PFRMean 0.61 -0.11 0.12
## NAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PFRMean 0.31 -0.57 0.12
## NAC_lowENV_highSTR_PFRMean 0.70 0.30 0.12
## NAC_highENV_lowSTR_PFRMean 0.71 -0.11 0.14
## NAC_highENV_highSTR_PFRMean 0.48 -0.89 0.11
### risk perception
values_PFR<-mean(filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PFRMean)
values_PFR<-rbind(values_PFR,mean(filteredData$RAC_lowENV_highSTR_PFRMean))
values_PFR<-rbind(values_PFR,mean(filteredData$RAC_highENV_lowSTR_PFRMean))
values_PFR<-rbind(values_PFR,mean(filteredData$RAC_highENV_highSTR_PFRMean))
values_PFR<-rbind(values_PFR,mean(filteredData$NAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PFRMean))
values_PFR<-rbind(values_PFR,mean(filteredData$NAC_lowENV_highSTR_PFRMean))
values_PFR<-rbind(values_PFR,mean(filteredData$NAC_highENV_lowSTR_PFRMean))
values_PFR<-rbind(values_PFR,mean(filteredData$NAC_highENV_highSTR_PFRMean))
barplot_risk<-data.frame(
kategorien = c("RAC_lowEnv_lowSTR","RAC_lowEnv_highSTR","RAC_highEnv_lowSTR","RAC_highEnv_highSTR","NAC_lowEnv_lowSTR","NAC_lowEnv_highSTR","NAC_highEnv_lowSTR","NAC_highEnv_highSTR"),
Perceived_Function_Risk = values_PFR
)
ggplot(barplot_risk, aes(x = reorder(kategorien, Perceived_Function_Risk), y = Perceived_Function_Risk, fill = kategorien)) +
geom_bar(stat = "identity", fill = "#66B3E8")+
labs(title = "Perceived Functional Risk", x = "Scenarios", y = "Perceived Functional Risk")+ coord_flip()+theme_minimal()
### willingness to pay
values_WTP<-mean(filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_WTP)
values_WTP<-rbind(values_WTP,mean(filteredData$RAC_lowENV_highSTR_WTP))
values_WTP<-rbind(values_WTP,mean(filteredData$RAC_highENV_lowSTR_WTP))
values_WTP<-rbind(values_WTP,mean(filteredData$RAC_highENV_highSTR_WTP))
values_WTP<-rbind(values_WTP,mean(filteredData$NAC_lowENV_lowSTR_WTP))
values_WTP<-rbind(values_WTP,mean(filteredData$NAC_lowENV_highSTR_WTP))
values_WTP<-rbind(values_WTP,mean(filteredData$NAC_highENV_lowSTR_WTP))
values_WTP<-rbind(values_WTP,mean(filteredData$NAC_highENV_highSTR_WTP))
barplot_WIP<-data.frame(
kategorien = c("RAC_lowEnv_lowSTR","RAC_lowEnv_highSTR","RAC_highEnv_lowSTR","RAC_highEnv_highSTR","NAC_lowEnv_lowSTR","NAC_lowEnv_highSTR","NAC_highEnv_lowSTR","NAC_highEnv_highSTR"),
WIP = values_WTP
)
ggplot(barplot_WIP, aes(x = reorder(kategorien, WIP), y = WIP, fill = kategorien)) +
geom_bar(stat = "identity", fill = "#66C3E8")+
labs(title = "Willingness to pay", x = "Scenarios", y = "Willingness to pay")+ coord_flip()+theme_minimal()
### product preference
values_Pref<-mean(filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_Pref)
values_Pref<-rbind(values_Pref,mean(filteredData$RAC_lowENV_highSTR_Pref))
values_Pref<-rbind(values_Pref,mean(filteredData$RAC_highENV_lowSTR_Pref))
values_Pref<-rbind(values_Pref,mean(filteredData$RAC_highENV_highSTR_Pref))
values_Pref<-rbind(values_Pref,mean(filteredData$NAC_lowENV_lowSTR_Pref))
values_Pref<-rbind(values_Pref,mean(filteredData$NAC_lowENV_highSTR_Pref))
values_Pref<-rbind(values_Pref,mean(filteredData$NAC_highENV_lowSTR_Pref))
values_Pref<-rbind(values_Pref,mean(filteredData$NAC_highENV_highSTR_Pref))
barplot_Pref<-data.frame(
kategorien = c("RAC_lowEnv_lowSTR","RAC_lowEnv_highSTR","RAC_highEnv_lowSTR","RAC_highEnv_highSTR","NAC_lowEnv_lowSTR","NAC_lowEnv_highSTR","NAC_highEnv_lowSTR","NAC_highEnv_highSTR"),
Product_Preference = values_Pref
)
ggplot(barplot_Pref, aes(x = reorder(kategorien, Product_Preference), y = Product_Preference)) +
geom_bar(stat = "identity", fill = "#66D3E8")+
labs(title = "Product Preference", x = "Scenarios", y = "Product Preference")+ coord_flip()+theme_minimal()
##anova 2x2x2 within
#Environmental Value
PEV_aov <- aov_ez(
id="id",
dv="PEVMean",
data=filteredData_long,
within=c("Material","EnvironmentalImpact","StructuralPerformance"),
anova_table=list(es="pes")
)
PEV_aov
## Anova Table (Type 3 tests)
##
## Response: PEVMean
## Effect df MSE F
## 1 Material 1, 82 4.66 109.01 ***
## 2 EnvironmentalImpact 1, 82 1.71 119.94 ***
## 3 StructuralPerformance 1, 82 0.57 0.05
## 4 Material:EnvironmentalImpact 1, 82 1.05 0.69
## 5 Material:StructuralPerformance 1, 82 0.72 3.68 +
## 6 EnvironmentalImpact:StructuralPerformance 1, 82 0.65 0.15
## 7 Material:EnvironmentalImpact:StructuralPerformance 1, 82 0.61 2.28
## pes p.value
## 1 .571 <.001
## 2 .594 <.001
## 3 <.001 .817
## 4 .008 .408
## 5 .043 .059
## 6 .002 .701
## 7 .027 .135
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '+' 0.1 ' ' 1
PEV_aov_table<-PEV_aov[["anova_table"]]
#post-hoc tests
PEV_aov_ph1<-emmeans(PEV_aov,"Material")
pairs(PEV_aov_ph1, adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## RAC - NAC 1.75 0.167 82 10.441 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance, EnvironmentalImpact
PEV_aov_ph1<-as.data.frame(PEV_aov_ph1)
PEV_aov_ph2<-emmeans(PEV_aov,"EnvironmentalImpact")
pairs(PEV_aov_ph2, adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## lowENV - highENV 1.11 0.101 82 10.951 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance, Material
PEV_aov_ph2<-as.data.frame(PEV_aov_ph2)
PEV_aov_ph3<-emmeans(PEV_aov,"StructuralPerformance")
pairs(PEV_aov_ph3, adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## lowSTR - highSTR 0.0136 0.0585 82 0.232 0.8174
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: EnvironmentalImpact, Material
PEV_aov_ph3<-as.data.frame(PEV_aov_ph3)
emmeans(PEV_aov,"EnvironmentalImpact", by = "Material")
## Material = RAC:
## EnvironmentalImpact emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL
## lowENV 5.14 0.120 82 4.91 5.38
## highENV 4.10 0.147 82 3.81 4.39
##
## Material = NAC:
## EnvironmentalImpact emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL
## lowENV 3.46 0.146 82 3.17 3.75
## highENV 2.29 0.124 82 2.04 2.53
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance
## Confidence level used: 0.95
PEV_aov_ph4<-emmeans(PEV_aov,"EnvironmentalImpact", by = "Material")
pairs(PEV_aov_ph4,adjust = "tukey")
## Material = RAC:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## lowENV - highENV 1.04 0.113 82 9.215 <.0001
##
## Material = NAC:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## lowENV - highENV 1.18 0.143 82 8.231 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance
emmeans(PEV_aov,"Material", by = "EnvironmentalImpact")
## EnvironmentalImpact = lowENV:
## Material emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL
## RAC 5.14 0.120 82 4.91 5.38
## NAC 3.46 0.146 82 3.17 3.75
##
## EnvironmentalImpact = highENV:
## Material emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL
## RAC 4.10 0.147 82 3.81 4.39
## NAC 2.29 0.124 82 2.04 2.53
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance
## Confidence level used: 0.95
PEV_aov_ph5<-emmeans(PEV_aov,"Material", by = "EnvironmentalImpact")
pairs(PEV_aov_ph5,adjust = "tukey")
## EnvironmentalImpact = lowENV:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## RAC - NAC 1.68 0.188 82 8.955 <.0001
##
## EnvironmentalImpact = highENV:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## RAC - NAC 1.81 0.183 82 9.915 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance
To compare the perception of the stairways element, a 2 (material: RAC vs. NAC) x 2 (environmental impact: low vs high) x 2 (structural performance: high vs. low) repeated measures ANOVA was calculated for four different dependent variables. For perceived environmental value, the analysis yielded a significant main effect of material, F(1, 82) = 109.01, p = 0, \(\eta_{p}^{2}\) = 0.570696. Tukey post-hoc tests revealed higher perceived environmental value for stairways made of RAC (M = 4.62) compared to stairways made of NAC (M = 2.87). The main effect of environmental impact was also significant, F(1, 82) = 119.94, p = 0, \(\eta_{p}^{2}\) = 0.5939288, with Tukey post-hoc tests revealing higher perceived environmental value for stairways with a low environmental impact (M = 4.3) compared to stairways made of RAC (M = 3.19). The main effect of structural performance as well as all interactions were non-significant (all p > .05).
#functional risk
PFR_aov <- aov_ez(
id="id",
dv="PFRMean",
data=filteredData_long,
within=c("Material","EnvironmentalImpact","StructuralPerformance"),
anova_table=list(es="pes")
)
summary(PFR_aov)
##
## Univariate Type III Repeated-Measures ANOVA Assuming Sphericity
##
## Sum Sq num Df Error SS
## (Intercept) 4588.5 1 426.88
## Material 11.8 1 91.53
## EnvironmentalImpact 0.3 1 46.30
## StructuralPerformance 30.6 1 107.03
## Material:EnvironmentalImpact 0.4 1 42.22
## Material:StructuralPerformance 0.6 1 46.97
## EnvironmentalImpact:StructuralPerformance 0.0 1 42.08
## Material:EnvironmentalImpact:StructuralPerformance 0.1 1 39.00
## den Df F value Pr(>F)
## (Intercept) 82 881.4109 < 2.2e-16
## Material 82 10.5671 0.001671
## EnvironmentalImpact 82 0.4861 0.487658
## StructuralPerformance 82 23.4304 6.005e-06
## Material:EnvironmentalImpact 82 0.7028 0.404283
## Material:StructuralPerformance 82 0.9997 0.320332
## EnvironmentalImpact:StructuralPerformance 82 0.0594 0.808008
## Material:EnvironmentalImpact:StructuralPerformance 82 0.2288 0.633705
##
## (Intercept) ***
## Material **
## EnvironmentalImpact
## StructuralPerformance ***
## Material:EnvironmentalImpact
## Material:StructuralPerformance
## EnvironmentalImpact:StructuralPerformance
## Material:EnvironmentalImpact:StructuralPerformance
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1
PFR_aov_table<-PFR_aov[["anova_table"]]
#post hoc tests
PFR_aov_ph1<-emmeans(PFR_aov,specs="Material")
contrast(PFR_aov_ph1, "pairwise", adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## RAC - NAC 0.267 0.082 82 3.251 0.0017
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance, EnvironmentalImpact
pairs(PFR_aov_ph1, adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## RAC - NAC 0.267 0.082 82 3.251 0.0017
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance, EnvironmentalImpact
PFR_aov_ph1<-as.data.frame(PFR_aov_ph1)
PFR_aov_ph2<-emmeans(PFR_aov,"StructuralPerformance")
pairs(PFR_aov_ph2, adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## lowSTR - highSTR 0.429 0.0887 82 4.840 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: EnvironmentalImpact, Material
PFR_aov_ph2<-as.data.frame(PFR_aov_ph2)
PFR_aov_ph3<-emmeans(PFR_aov,"EnvironmentalImpact")
pairs(PFR_aov_ph3, adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## lowENV - highENV 0.0407 0.0583 82 0.697 0.4877
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance, Material
PFR_aov_ph3<-as.data.frame(PFR_aov_ph3)
##Means
emmeans(PFR_aov,"StructuralPerformance", by = "Material")
## Material = RAC:
## StructuralPerformance emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL
## lowSTR 3.01 0.1310 82 2.75 3.27
## highSTR 2.52 0.0978 82 2.32 2.71
##
## Material = NAC:
## StructuralPerformance emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL
## lowSTR 2.68 0.1120 82 2.46 2.90
## highSTR 2.31 0.1010 82 2.11 2.51
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: EnvironmentalImpact
## Confidence level used: 0.95
PEV_aov_ph4<-emmeans(PFR_aov,"StructuralPerformance", by = "Material")
pairs(PEV_aov_ph4,adjust = "tukey")
## Material = RAC:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## lowSTR - highSTR 0.488 0.112 82 4.356 <.0001
##
## Material = NAC:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## lowSTR - highSTR 0.370 0.100 82 3.690 0.0004
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: EnvironmentalImpact
emmeans(PFR_aov,"Material", by = "StructuralPerformance")
## StructuralPerformance = lowSTR:
## Material emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL
## RAC 3.01 0.1310 82 2.75 3.27
## NAC 2.68 0.1120 82 2.46 2.90
##
## StructuralPerformance = highSTR:
## Material emmean SE df lower.CL upper.CL
## RAC 2.52 0.0978 82 2.32 2.71
## NAC 2.31 0.1010 82 2.11 2.51
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: EnvironmentalImpact
## Confidence level used: 0.95
PEV_aov_ph5<-emmeans(PFR_aov,"Material", by = "StructuralPerformance")
pairs(PEV_aov_ph5,adjust = "tukey")
## StructuralPerformance = lowSTR:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## RAC - NAC 0.325 0.109 82 2.983 0.0038
##
## StructuralPerformance = highSTR:
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## RAC - NAC 0.208 0.092 82 2.260 0.0265
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: EnvironmentalImpact
For perceived functional risk, the analysis yielded a significant main effect of material, F(1, 82) = 10.57, p = 0.002. Tukey post-hoc tests revealed higher perceived functional risk for stairways made of RAC (M = 2.76) compared to stairways made of NAC (M = 2.5). The main effect of structural performance was also significant, F(1, 82) = 23.43, p = 0, with Tukey post-hoc tests revealing higher perceived functional risk for stairways with a low structural performance (M = 2.84) compared to stairways made of RAC (M = 2.41). The main effect of environmental impact as well as all interactions were non-significant (all p > .05).
#WTP
WTP_aov <- aov_ez(
id="id",
dv="WTP",
data=filteredData_long,
within=c("Material","EnvironmentalImpact","StructuralPerformance"),
anova_table=list(es="pes")
)
WTP_aov
## Anova Table (Type 3 tests)
##
## Response: WTP
## Effect df MSE F
## 1 Material 1, 82 73255.91 15.16 ***
## 2 EnvironmentalImpact 1, 82 33181.10 30.95 ***
## 3 StructuralPerformance 1, 82 15458.43 15.86 ***
## 4 Material:EnvironmentalImpact 1, 82 12025.30 1.46
## 5 Material:StructuralPerformance 1, 82 10391.05 0.47
## 6 EnvironmentalImpact:StructuralPerformance 1, 82 13912.80 2.59
## 7 Material:EnvironmentalImpact:StructuralPerformance 1, 82 15602.24 2.02
## pes p.value
## 1 .156 <.001
## 2 .274 <.001
## 3 .162 <.001
## 4 .017 .231
## 5 .006 .496
## 6 .031 .111
## 7 .024 .159
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '+' 0.1 ' ' 1
WTP_aov_table<-WTP_aov[["anova_table"]]
#post hoc tests
WTP_aov_ph1<-emmeans(WTP_aov,"Material")
pairs(WTP_aov_ph1, adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## RAC - NAC 81.8 21 82 3.894 0.0002
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance, EnvironmentalImpact
WTP_aov_ph1<-as.data.frame(WTP_aov_ph1)
WTP_aov_ph2<-emmeans(WTP_aov,"EnvironmentalImpact")
pairs(WTP_aov_ph2, adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## lowENV - highENV 78.7 14.1 82 5.563 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance, Material
WTP_aov_ph2<-as.data.frame(WTP_aov_ph2)
WTP_aov_ph3<-emmeans(WTP_aov,"StructuralPerformance")
pairs(WTP_aov_ph3, adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## lowSTR - highSTR -38.4 9.65 82 -3.982 0.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: EnvironmentalImpact, Material
WTP_aov_ph3<-as.data.frame(WTP_aov_ph3)
For willingness to pay, the analysis yielded a significant main effect of material, F(1, 82) = 15.16, p = 0. Tukey post-hoc tests revealed higher willingness to pay for stairways made of RAC (M = 1011.71) compared to stairways made of NAC (M = 929.91). The main effect of environmental impact was also significant, F(1, 82) = 30.95, p = 0, with Tukey post-hoc tests revealing higher willingness to pay for stairways with a low environmental impact (M = 1010.14) compared to stairways with a high environmental impact (M = 931.49). The main effect of structural performance was also significant, F(1, 82) = 15.86, p = 0, with Tukey post-hoc tests revealing higher willingness to pay for stairways with a high structural performance (M = 990.03) compared to stairways made of RAC (M = 951.6). All interactions were non-significant (all p > .05).
#Preference
Pref_aov <- aov_ez(
id="id",
dv="Pref",
data=filteredData_long,
within=c("Material","EnvironmentalImpact","StructuralPerformance"),
anova_table=list(es="pes")
)
Pref_aov
## Anova Table (Type 3 tests)
##
## Response: Pref
## Effect df MSE F pes
## 1 Material 1, 82 3.91 32.37 *** .283
## 2 EnvironmentalImpact 1, 82 2.28 57.14 *** .411
## 3 StructuralPerformance 1, 82 1.53 10.63 ** .115
## 4 Material:EnvironmentalImpact 1, 82 1.31 1.32 .016
## 5 Material:StructuralPerformance 1, 82 0.87 2.78 + .033
## 6 EnvironmentalImpact:StructuralPerformance 1, 82 0.98 1.57 .019
## 7 Material:EnvironmentalImpact:StructuralPerformance 1, 82 0.91 1.69 .020
## p.value
## 1 <.001
## 2 <.001
## 3 .002
## 4 .253
## 5 .099
## 6 .214
## 7 .198
## ---
## Signif. codes: 0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '+' 0.1 ' ' 1
Pref_aov_table<-Pref_aov[["anova_table"]]
#post hoc tests
Pref_aov_ph1<-emmeans(Pref_aov,"Material")
pairs(Pref_aov_ph1, adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## RAC - NAC 0.873 0.154 82 5.690 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance, EnvironmentalImpact
Pref_aov_ph1<-as.data.frame(Pref_aov_ph1)
Pref_aov_ph2<-emmeans(Pref_aov,"EnvironmentalImpact")
pairs(Pref_aov_ph2, adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## lowENV - highENV 0.886 0.117 82 7.559 <.0001
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: StructuralPerformance, Material
Pref_aov_ph2<-as.data.frame(Pref_aov_ph2)
Pref_aov_ph3<-emmeans(Pref_aov,"StructuralPerformance")
pairs(Pref_aov_ph3, adjust="tukey")
## contrast estimate SE df t.ratio p.value
## lowSTR - highSTR -0.313 0.0961 82 -3.260 0.0016
##
## Results are averaged over the levels of: EnvironmentalImpact, Material
Pref_aov_ph3<-as.data.frame(Pref_aov_ph3)
For preference, the analysis yielded a significant main effect of material, F(1, 82) = 32.37, p = 0. Tukey post-hoc tests revealed higher preference for stairways made of RAC (M = 4.19) compared to stairways made of NAC (M = 3.32). The main effect of environmental impact was also significant, F(1, 82) = 57.14, p = 0, with Tukey post-hoc tests revealing higher preference for stairways with a low environmental impact (M = 4.2) compared to stairways with a high environmental impact (M = 3.31). The main effect of structural performance was also significant, F(1, 82) = 10.63, p = 0.002, with Tukey post-hoc tests revealing higher preference for stairways with a high structural performance (M = 3.91) compared to stairways made of RAC (M = 3.6). All interactions were non-significant (all p > .05).
###comparison of RAC with vs without info
##comparison of EF with Sz1 (low ENV - low STR)
#rating of RAC element without info
RAC_PEV<-describe(filteredData$EF_PEVMean)
RAC_PEV
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 5.89 0.84 6 5.97 0.74 3.25 7 3.75 -0.75 0.29 0.09
RAC_PFR<-describe(filteredData$EF_PFRMean)
RAC_PFR
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 2.56 1.1 2.5 2.49 1.11 1 5.5 4.5 0.5 -0.29 0.12
RAC_WTP<-describe(filteredData$EF_WTP)
RAC_WTP
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis
## X1 1 83 1119.04 258.53 1109 1123.04 163.09 554 2000 1446 0.13 0.61
## se
## X1 28.38
#rating of RAC element with info
RAC_wInfo_PEV<-describe(filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean)
RAC_wInfo_PEV
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 5.16 1.25 5.25 5.26 1.11 1.25 7 5.75 -0.83 0.58 0.14
RAC_wInfo_PFR<-describe(filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PFRMean)
RAC_wInfo_PFR
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis se
## X1 1 83 3 1.24 3 2.93 1.48 1 6 5 0.51 -0.46 0.14
RAC_wInfo_WTP<-describe(filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_WTP)
RAC_wInfo_WTP
## vars n mean sd median trimmed mad min max range skew kurtosis
## X1 1 83 1024.46 213.76 1000 1024.88 151.23 379 1615 1236 -0.02 1.09
## se
## X1 23.46
#t test for comparison
t_info_PEV<-t.test(filteredData$EF_PEVMean, filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean, paired=TRUE)
t_info_PEV
##
## Paired t-test
##
## data: filteredData$EF_PEVMean and filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean
## t = 5.0215, df = 82, p-value = 2.94e-06
## alternative hypothesis: true mean difference is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 0.4456044 1.0302992
## sample estimates:
## mean difference
## 0.7379518
t_info_PFR<-t.test(filteredData$EF_PFRMean, filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PFRMean, paired=TRUE)
t_info_PFR
##
## Paired t-test
##
## data: filteredData$EF_PFRMean and filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PFRMean
## t = -3.0281, df = 82, p-value = 0.003289
## alternative hypothesis: true mean difference is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## -0.7186769 -0.1487930
## sample estimates:
## mean difference
## -0.4337349
t_info_WTP<-t.test(filteredData$EF_WTP, filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_WTP, paired=TRUE)
t_info_WTP
##
## Paired t-test
##
## data: filteredData$EF_WTP and filteredData$RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_WTP
## t = 3.7148, df = 82, p-value = 0.00037
## alternative hypothesis: true mean difference is not equal to 0
## 95 percent confidence interval:
## 43.93057 145.22605
## sample estimates:
## mean difference
## 94.57831
filteredData_ttest<-filteredData%>%select("id","EF_PEVMean","RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PEVMean","EF_PFRMean","RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_PFRMean","EF_WTP","RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_WTP")
filteredData_ttest_long<-filteredData_ttest%>% pivot_longer(
cols = EF_PEVMean:RAC_lowENV_lowSTR_WTP,
names_to=c("DPP",".value"),
names_pattern = "(EF|RAC_lowENV_lowSTR)_(.*)"
)
filteredData_ttest_long %>% cohens_d(PEVMean ~ DPP, paired = TRUE)
## # A tibble: 1 × 7
## .y. group1 group2 effsize n1 n2 magnitude
## * <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <int> <int> <ord>
## 1 PEVMean EF RAC_lowENV_lowSTR 0.551 83 83 moderate
filteredData_ttest_long %>% cohens_d(PFRMean ~ DPP, paired = TRUE)
## # A tibble: 1 × 7
## .y. group1 group2 effsize n1 n2 magnitude
## * <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <int> <int> <ord>
## 1 PFRMean EF RAC_lowENV_lowSTR -0.332 83 83 small
filteredData_ttest_long %>% cohens_d(WTP ~ DPP, paired = TRUE)
## # A tibble: 1 × 7
## .y. group1 group2 effsize n1 n2 magnitude
## * <chr> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <int> <int> <ord>
## 1 WTP EF RAC_lowENV_lowSTR 0.408 83 83 small
Lastly, the RAC element without additional information, presented in the first part of the study, was compared to the RAC element with additional information as presented in the second part of the study. Perceived environmental value was significantly higher for the RAC element without additional information, M = 5.89 (SD = 0.84), compared to the RAC element presented with additional information M = 5.16 (SD = 1.25), t(82) = 5.02, p = 0.
Perceived functional risk was significantly lower for the RAC element without additional information, M = 2.56 (SD = 1.1), compared to the RAC element presented with additional information M = 3 (SD = 1.24), t(82) = -3.03, p = 0.003.
Willingness to pay was significantly higher for the RAC element without additional information, M = 1119.04 € (SD = 258.53), compared to the RAC element presented with additional information M = 1024.46 € (SD = 213.76), t(82) = 3.71, p = 0.