h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Voll:228954,
      author       = {Voll, Philip},
      othercontributors = {Bardow, André},
      title        = {{A}utomated optimization based synthesis of distributed
                      energy supply systems; 1. {A}ufl.},
      volume       = {1},
      address      = {Aachen},
      publisher    = {Mainz},
      reportid     = {RWTH-CONV-143971},
      isbn         = {978-3-86130-474-6},
      series       = {Aachener Beiträge zur technischen Thermodynamik},
      pages        = {XXII, 185 S. : Ill., graph. Darst.},
      year         = {2014},
      note         = {Druckausg. ersch. im Buchhandel als Bd. 1 der Reihe des
                      Instituts für Technische Thermodynamik: Aachener Beiträge
                      zur Technischen Thermodynamik. - Druckausg.: Voll, Philip:
                      Automated optimization based synthesis of distributed energy
                      supply systems; Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2013},
      abstract     = {The conceptual synthesis of distributed energy supply
                      systems (DESS) is an inherently challenging problem that is
                      characterized by time-dependent constraints (e.g., energy
                      demands, ambient temperatures curves, etc.), economy of
                      scale of equipment investment, limited capacities of
                      standardized equipment, and part-load performance
                      characteristics of the considered energy conversion units.
                      Moreover, for optimal DESS synthesis, multiple redundant
                      units are generally to be expected. Optimization-based
                      synthesis methods offer great potentials for the synthesis
                      of cost-effective, energy-efficient, and sustainable
                      systems. However, a lack of adequate, user-friendly methods
                      has so far hindered routine application of optimization in
                      engineering practice. In research, most commonly,
                      superstructure-based synthesis is performed for optimal
                      systems synthesis. In this approach, a user-defined
                      superstructure is analyzed using mathematical programming
                      techniques to identify the optimal solution among the
                      alternatives encoded in the superstructure. Current
                      optimization software facilitates the use of
                      superstructure-based synthesis, e.g., by enabling easy
                      problem definition through graphical superstructure
                      modeling. However, the a priori definition of the
                      superstructure remains a serious obstacle for the use of
                      superstructure-based synthesis in industrial practice: On
                      the one hand, the manual superstructure definition bears the
                      risk to exclude the optimum from consideration; on the other
                      hand, the use of excessively large superstructures causes
                      prohibitively large computational effort. To circumvent
                      these drawbacks, superstructure-generation methods and
                      superstructure-free synthesis methods have been proposed.
                      Superstructure-generation methods automatically define a
                      superstructure for a given synthesis problem.
                      Superstructure-free methods avoid the use of a
                      superstructure by enabling simultaneous alternatives
                      generation and optimization. Available approaches involve
                      several drawbacks that impede their use for the optimal
                      synthesis of distributed energy supply systems:
                      Superstructure-generation methods neglect major DESS
                      characteristics; superstructure-free methods require the
                      manual definition of many technology-specific replacement
                      rules, which is equally difficult as the definition of an
                      appropriate superstructure. In this thesis, two novel
                      synthesis methodologies are proposed to facilitate the use
                      of optimization for efficient and reliable DESS synthesis,
                      thus making optimization accessible for practitioners: The
                      automated superstructure-based and the superstructure-free
                      synthesis methodology. The proposed methodologies avoid both
                      the a priori definition of a superstructure and the manual
                      definition of many technology-specific replacement rules
                      while accounting for the major characteristics inherent to
                      DESS synthesis problems. The superstructure-based framework
                      relies on an algorithm for automated
                      superstructure-generation. The method employs a successive
                      superstructure expansion and optimization strategy that
                      continuously increases the number of units included in the
                      superstructure until the optimal solution is identified. The
                      superstructure-free approach combines evolutionary
                      optimization and deterministic optimization for simultaneous
                      alternatives generation and optimization. A
                      knowledge-integrated mutation operator is proposed that
                      relies on a hierarchically-structured graph, the so-called
                      energy conversion hierarchy (ECH). The ECH efficiently
                      defines all reasonable replacement rules, thus avoiding
                      their manual definition. The mutation operator performs
                      structural replacements for the evolutionary generation of
                      solution alternatives. Both synthesis methodologies use a
                      generic component-based modeling framework, thus making the
                      methodologies independent of the employed mathematical
                      programming formulation. In this thesis, a robust MILP
                      formulation is used that allows to simultaneously optimize
                      the structure, sizing, and operation of distributed energy
                      supply systems accounting for time-varying load profiles,
                      continuous equipment sizing, economy of scale of equipment
                      investment, and part-load equipment performance. In this
                      thesis, it is shown that both synthesis methodologies
                      proposed in this thesis enable practitioners to perform
                      optimization-based synthesis of distributed energy supply
                      systems. It should be pointed out that the use of the
                      proposed synthesis methodologies only requires
                      energy-related expert knowledge that is usually prevailing
                      among engineers active in the field of energy systems
                      synthesis. In particular, no expert knowledge on
                      mathematical programming is required. Finally, this thesis
                      provides the foundation for future research as discussed in
                      the next section. Last but not least, based on the
                      experience gained during the work on this thesis, the author
                      comments on the necessity of optimization for the conceptual
                      DESS synthesis.},
      keywords     = {Optimierung (SWD) / Energieversorgung (SWD) / Entwurf
                      (SWD)},
      cin          = {412110},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)412110_20140620$},
      shelfmark    = {ZP 2900},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11 / PUB:(DE-HGF)3},
      urn          = {urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-opus-49136},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/228954},
}