% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Riegel:479433,
author = {Riegel, Christoph},
othercontributors = {Vallée, Dirk and Tietz, Hans-Peter},
title = {{D}ie {B}erücksichtigung des {S}chutzes kritischer
{I}nfrastrukturen in der {R}aumplanung : zum {S}tellenwert
des {KRITIS}-{G}rundsatzes im {R}aumordnungsgesetz},
volume = {59},
school = {Zugl.: Aachen, Techn. Hochsch.},
type = {Dissertation},
address = {Aachen},
publisher = {Institut für Stadtbauwesen und Stadtverkehr, RWTH Aachen
University},
reportid = {RWTH-2015-03094},
isbn = {978-3-88354-170-9},
series = {Berichte des Instituts für Stadtbauwesen und Stadtverkehr
der RWTH Aachen},
pages = {XVIII, 215 S. : Ill., graph. Darst., Kt.},
year = {2015},
note = {Auch veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH
Aachen University; Zugl.: Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss.,
2015},
abstract = {Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) and resilience is
an upcoming and increasingly relevant issue to public
administrations, societies and economies. The frequent
occurrence of global disasters reminds us of how deeply we
rely on infrastructure services that are complex,
interrelated and interdependent. It has become evident that,
according to the definition of critical infrastructure,
failure or functional impairment of such organizations and
institutions of special importance for the country and its
people would lead to severe supply bottlenecks, significant
disturbance of public order or other dramatic consequences.
Current strategies for infrastructure resilience often focus
on sector specific risk assessment and management
activities. But from the regional planner`s perspective,
infrastructure sites and alignments like highways, rail
tracks, transmission lines and water or gas pipelines cannot
be considered as separate and independent from surrounding
conditions. As damage of infrastructure components may have
cascading effects, mutual influences resulting from
proximity, intersections and interconnections to other
infrastructures have to be considered. In 2008, a new
principle of spatial planning was added to the German
Federal Spatial Planning Act. It demands Critical
Infrastructure Protection be taken into account in all
spatial planning activities. Since the term CIP is quite
young, this problem has not yet been explicitly treated in
spatial planning activities. The dissertation analyzes the
definitions and concepts related to CIP. It presents results
from a qualitative analysis of available regional spatial
structure plans and from a survey of all regional spatial
planning authorities in Germany. It shows that regional
spatial planning has marginally dealt with CIP related
questions like infrastructure reliability and spatial
exposure in the past. However, the CIP concept, in addition
to regional spatial planning methods and procedures, needs
comprehensive efforts to approach and synchronize both
public functions.The proposed methodology analyses the
density of infrastructures in relation to their
cross-sectoral and accumulative relevance. It maps spatial
criticality by defining a proximity factor which is
multiplied with an indicator representing the prominence of
each component. This allows mapping hot-spots of highly
accumulated critical infrastructures.},
cin = {313310},
ddc = {624},
cid = {$I:(DE-82)313310_20140620$},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11 / PUB:(DE-HGF)3},
urn = {urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-rwth-2015-030944},
url = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/479433},
}
guest ::