h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Sattarvand:51125,
      author       = {Sattarvand, Javad},
      othercontributors = {Niemann-Delius, Christian},
      title        = {{L}ong-term open-pit planning by ant colony optimization},
      address      = {Aachen},
      publisher    = {Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University},
      reportid     = {RWTH-CONV-113440},
      pages        = {XII, 130 S. : Ill., graph. Darst.},
      year         = {2009},
      note         = {Zusammenfassung in dt. und engl. Sprache. - Retraction. Aus
                      rechtlichen Gründen kann der Zugriff nicht gewährt werden},
      abstract     = {The problem of long-term planning of a hard rock open pit
                      mine (discontinuous exploitation operation) is a large
                      combinatorial problem which cannot be solved in a reasonable
                      amount of time through mathematical programming models
                      because of its large size. In this thesis, a new
                      metaheuristic algorithm has been developed based on the Ant
                      Colony Optimization (ACO) and its application in long-term
                      scheduling of a two dimensional hypothetical block model has
                      been analysed. ACO is inspired by the foraging behaviour of
                      ants (i.e. finding the shortest way from the colony to the
                      food source), and has been successfully implemented in
                      several combinatorial optimization problems. In nature, ants
                      transmit a message to other members by laying down a trail
                      with a chemical called pheromones. Instead of travelling in
                      a random manner, the pheromone trail allows the ants to
                      trace the path. Over time, the pheromones layed over longer
                      paths evaporate, whereas those over shorter routes continue
                      to be marched over. In order to simulate the ACO process for
                      long-term planning of a hard rock open-pit mine, various
                      programming variables have been considered for each block as
                      the pheromone trails. The number of these variables is equal
                      to the number of planning periods. In fact these pheromone
                      trails represent the desirability of the block for being the
                      deepest point of the mine in that column for the given
                      mining period. The shape of any given pit (in respect to the
                      slope angles) can be represented by means of a simple array
                      of integer numbers. Each element in this array shows the
                      depth of the pit in an individual column of block model.
                      Extending this concept to a long-term production planning, a
                      mine schedule would be represented by an array that has
                      several mine depths at each column of block model related to
                      different production periods. At the beginning, the values
                      of the pheromone trails are initialized according to a mine
                      schedule generated by Lerchs-Grossmann’s algorithm and the
                      alternative to parameterization algorithm of Wang $\&$
                      Sevim. During initialization, relatively higher values of
                      pheromones are assigned to those blocks that are close to
                      the deepest points of the push backs in the initial mine
                      schedule. This leads the procedure to construct a series of
                      random schedules which are not far from the initial
                      solution. In each ACO iteration, several mine schedules are
                      constructed based on current pheromone trails. This is
                      implemented through a process called “depth
                      determination”. In this process the depth of a mine in
                      each period is determined for each column of the block
                      model. The higher the value of the pheromone trail of a
                      particular block, the higher the possibility of selecting
                      that block as the pit depth in that period. Subsequently the
                      pheromone values of all blocks are reduced to a certain
                      percentage (evaporation) and additionally the pheromone
                      value of the participating blocks used in defining the
                      constructed schedules are increased according to the quality
                      of the generated solutions. Through repeated iterations, the
                      pheromone values of the blocks which define the shape of the
                      optimum solution are increased whereas those of the others
                      have been significantly evaporated. The ACO optimization
                      iterations could be implemented in a variety of ways. The
                      Ant System (AS) is the first and simplest method, whereby
                      all of the constructed schedules are allowed to contribute
                      in the pheromone deposition. In each iteration of the second
                      method, the Elitist Ant System (EAS), the best schedule
                      found up to that iteration (the best-so-far schedule) is
                      also allowed to deposit pheromones. ASrank is the third
                      method in which only a few good schedules are able to add
                      pheromones. The other variants are the Max-Min Ant System
                      (MMAS) and the Ant Colony System (ACS), which allow only the
                      best-so-far schedule to deposit pheromones and utilise
                      special pheromone limitations in order to prevent the
                      stagnation in local optimums. To test the efficiency of the
                      algorithm, a computer program has been developed in Visual
                      Basic 2005 programming language. As a case study, the block
                      model of a hypothetical iron ore deposit with 1000 blocks
                      was considered and different variants of ACO had been
                      analysed in order to find the best combination of ACO
                      parameters. The analysis revealed that the ACO is able to
                      improve the value of the initial mining schedule by up to
                      $34\%$ in a reasonable computational time. This is mainly
                      contributed to the consideration of the penalties to the
                      deviations of the capacities and the production qualities
                      from their permitted limits. It had also been proved that
                      the MMAS is the most explorative variant, while ACS is the
                      fastest method. These two variants also count as the only
                      variants which could be applied to a large block model in
                      respect to the amount of memory needed.},
      keywords     = {Tagebau (SWD) / Planung (SWD) / Ameisenalgorithmus (SWD) /
                      Optimierung (SWD)},
      cin          = {511410 / 510000},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)511410_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)510000_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      urn          = {urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-opus-26914},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/51125},
}