h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Tellers:538269,
      author       = {Tellers, Philipp},
      othercontributors = {Wagner, Hermann and Spehr, Marc},
      title        = {{R}epresentation of spatial and spectro-temporal cues in
                      the midbrain and forebrain of {N}orth {A}merican barn owls
                      ({T}yto furcata pratincola)},
      school       = {Aachen, Techn. Hochsch.},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Aachen},
      publisher    = {Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University},
      reportid     = {RWTH-2015-05159},
      pages        = {XI, 122, CXXXVI [Bl.] : Ill., graph. Darst.},
      year         = {2015},
      note         = {Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2015},
      abstract     = {The barn owl is a crepuscular and nocturnal bird of prey
                      that relies mainly on its acoustic system for the
                      identification and localization of potential prey. The barn
                      owl is able to localize even faint sounds in a natural
                      environment precisely. Like mammals, barn owls use the
                      interaural time difference (ITD) for the localization of the
                      azimuthal sound source position. In the barn owl’s
                      auditory system, ITD is processed in two separate pathways,
                      the midbrain and forebrain pathways, which are both able to
                      mediate an accurate representation of stimulus direction.
                      While the azimuthal position of the sound source is
                      represented by the ITD, stimulus identity is assumed to be
                      represented by the spectro-temporal structure of the
                      stimulus. In general, ITD is encoded by the response rate of
                      auditory neurons in the barn owl, while the temporal
                      response pattern of auditory neurons is often correlated to
                      the spectro-temporal structure of the stimulus. During my
                      PhD thesis, I analyzed the representation of both the ITD
                      and the spectro-temporal structure of acoustic stimuli in
                      the ICX and the auditory arcopallium (AAr) of the barn owl.
                      The ICX belongs to the midbrain pathway, while the AAr is a
                      forebrain nucleus. The results obtained from neurons located
                      in the two nuclei were compared to check whether the
                      encoding of stimulus parameters differed beyond a previously
                      reported reorganization of ITD encoding in the forebrain
                      pathway that is due to the combination of low- and
                      high-frequency components with different best ITDs. Both ITD
                      processing pathways integrate the output of narrowly tuned
                      neurons of the core of the IC (ICC). The output of ICC
                      neurons with different best frequencies is integrated to
                      solve ambiguities in the representation of ITD. The data
                      presented in the current thesis show major differences in
                      the encoding of ITD in the ICX and the AAr. While response
                      variability generally increased in single neurons during
                      across-frequency integration, AAr neurons exhibited a
                      significantly higher variability in their response rates
                      compared to ICX neurons. In the midbrain branch of the
                      auditory pathway, ITD is known to be represented by the
                      maximum response rate of single neurons. Typically, each
                      neuron responds only to one ITD maximally, i.e., the best
                      ITD. The reported increase in response variability of AAr
                      neurons was accompanied by a lower suppression of
                      side-peaks, causing a more ambiguous representation of the
                      best ITD in single neurons. Furthermore, the broad
                      main-peaks and the reported response variability of most
                      neurons resulted in a less accurate encoding of the best ITD
                      in the AAr compared to the two IC nuclei. The reported
                      increase in the response variability of AAr neurons is
                      presumably a consequence of the more complex encoding of
                      ITD. While across-frequency integration in the midbrain is
                      restricted to frequencies above 2 kHz and supposedly
                      phase-dependent – i.e., carrier sensitive – this thesis
                      showed that ITD encoding in the AAr exhibited both high- and
                      low-frequency carrier-sensitive elements as well as a
                      substantial low-pass carrier-tolerant component. The
                      low-pass carrier-tolerant response component originated from
                      the envelope of high-pass $(\>3$ kHz) stimulus components,
                      thus indicating that barn owls, like mammals, are able to
                      extract carrier-sensitive and carrier-tolerant ITDs from the
                      same frequency range. In accordance with previous studies,
                      this thesis also showed that the low-frequency
                      carrier-tolerant component exhibits larger best ITDs
                      compared to the carrier-sensitive components, indicating an
                      integration of inputs with different best ITDs in AAr
                      neurons.Whether the reported differences in ITD encoding of
                      the ICX and the AAr were related to a change in function was
                      analyzed in the final parts of this thesis. Thereby, the
                      focus was on two aspects, the time course of ITD encoding
                      and the representation of the spectro-temporal stimulus
                      structure. ITD representation in the AAr was delayed
                      compared to the ICX. ICX neurons exhibited lower latencies
                      compared to AAr neurons and strong onset – i.e., phasic
                      – responses to acoustic stimuli. By contrast, besides the
                      higher latencies, AAr neurons typically exhibited a more
                      sustained representation of ITD that in many neurons lasted
                      beyond the stimulus offset. These results are consistent
                      with behavioral studies that reported an involvement of the
                      AAr in the memory-based localization of auditory signals.
                      Furthermore, the response rate of a subpopulation of AAr
                      neurons steadily increased with stimulus duration,
                      indicating the existence of a temporal integration mechanism
                      in the forebrain pathway, which might be the reason for the
                      sustained representation of ITD.The changes in the encoding
                      of ITD from the midbrain to the forebrain were accompanied
                      by a differing representation of the spectro-temporal
                      stimulus structure. Spike generation was locked to the
                      occurrence of certain spectro-temporal stimulus structures
                      in neuronal subpopulations of both the ICX and the AAr.
                      Thus, neurons of both nuclei were able to encode the
                      spectro-temporal structure of the stimuli in their response
                      pattern. However, the ratio of neurons that exhibited a
                      correlation between the response pattern and the acoustic
                      stimulus was higher in the ICX compared to the AAr. The
                      generation of spikes in response to certain stimulus
                      structures was also more reliable in single ICX neurons,
                      while AAr neurons exhibited a higher temporal precision in
                      the spiking. Furthermore, single ICX neurons were, in
                      contrast to AAr neurons, able to represent both the best ITD
                      and the spectro-temporal stimulus structure accurately.
                      These results conform to previous published data.
                      Electrophysiological studies already reported that neurons
                      in the mammalian forebrain neglect the encoding of
                      spectro-temporal stimulus structure supposedly in favor of
                      the representation of abstract entities in the acoustic
                      stimulus, like echoes or ambient noise.In summary, this
                      thesis clearly showed that the encoding of ITD in the ICX
                      and the AAr exhibits major differences. The accurate and
                      unambiguous representation of ITD, the rather low response
                      variability and the integration across inputs with similar
                      best ITD in the ICX of the barn owl are in accordance with
                      previous studies that assumed a place code-like
                      representation of ITD in the ICX of the barn owl. By
                      contrast, the high response variability, the worse
                      representation of best ITD and the frequency dependence of
                      the best ITD reported for single AAr neurons makes it
                      unlikely that ITD is encoded in a place code, which depends
                      on an accurate and, more importantly unambiguous
                      representation of best ITD. The observed differences in both
                      the time course of ITD representation and the encoding of
                      spectro-temporal stimulus structure presumably reflect the
                      different function of the midbrain and forebrain ITD
                      processing pathway, with the former responsible for the
                      mediating of fast and accurate head saccades toward salient
                      stimuli and the latter more involved in the sustained,
                      memory-related representation of stimulus direction.},
      cin          = {162110 / 163310 / 160000},
      ddc          = {570},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)162110_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)163310_20140620$ /
                      $I:(DE-82)160000_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      urn          = {urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-rwth-2015-051599},
      doi          = {10.18154/RWTH-2015-05159},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/538269},
}