h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Jeude:62434,
      author       = {Jeude, Markus},
      othercontributors = {Büchs, Jochen},
      title        = {{E}ntwicklung und {A}nwendung einer
                      {F}ed-batch-{B}etriebsweise mit
                      {N}ährstofffreisetzungssystemen zur kontrollierten
                      {K}ultivierung und zum {S}creening von {M}ikroorganismen in
                      {S}chüttelreaktoren},
      address      = {Aachen},
      publisher    = {Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University},
      reportid     = {RWTH-CONV-124003},
      pages        = {XVII, 262 S. : Ill., graph. Darst.},
      year         = {2007},
      note         = {Aachen, Techn. Hochsch., Diss., 2007},
      abstract     = {Most industrial production processes are performed in
                      fed-batch operational mode. In contrast, the screenings for
                      microbial production strains are run in batch mode which
                      results in completely different physiological conditions
                      than relevant for production. This may lead to wrong strain
                      selections. Silicone elastomer discs containing glucose
                      crystals were developed to realize fed-batch fermentation
                      based on diffusion in shaken bioreactors. No other device
                      for feeding was required. This “slow-release fed-batch
                      technique” was tested on the metabolism of H. polymorpha,
                      E. coli and G. oxydans in shake flasks. The OTR and RQ were
                      monitored online with a RAMOS device. Biomass formation,
                      synthesis of proteins like GFP or eYFP-IL-6, pH drift and
                      metabolic dynamics of glucose, ethanol, acetic acid and
                      other organic acids were measured offline. By application of
                      the slow-release fed-batch technique in comparison to
                      regular batch mode, overflow-metabolism of H. polymorpha and
                      E. coli could be reduced, which led to an increase in
                      biomass yield of up to $85\%$ and $59\%,$ respectively. Up
                      to date, 23.4 g/L cell dry weight of H. polymorpha and 13.7
                      g/L of E. coli was achieved. The specific biomass yields of
                      0.38-0.47 are in the magnitude of those in laboratory
                      fermentors equipped with a substrate feed-pump. The GFP
                      expression by H. polymorpha RB11 pC10-GFP could be improved
                      in Syn6-MES and YNB mineral media up to 35-fold and
                      420-fold, respectively. The synthesized maximum in fed-batch
                      mode was 421 mg/L GFP. In contrast only up to 2.5 mg/L GFP
                      was received in batch mode. The expression of eYFP-IL-6 by
                      E. coli BL21 pLys pRSET eYFP-IL6 could be increased 4-fold
                      in optimized Wilms-MOPS mineral medium using the
                      slow-release fed-batch technique. Slow-release fed-batch
                      cultures of G. oxydans DSM 2003 revealed a 2.6-fold increase
                      of specific biomass yield in modified Silberbach-MES complex
                      medium. A cell dry weight of 3.3 g/L was obtained in
                      contrast to 1.6 g/L in batch mode. Due to glucose feeding a
                      reduction of gluconic acid as well as 2- and 5-ketogluconic
                      acid formation was monitored. A mass screening of 265 H.
                      polymorpha RB11 pC10-FMD clones and 267 pC10-MOX clones was
                      performed in Syn6-MES mineral medium in deep-well plates. A
                      batch with glucose and one with glycerol were performed
                      simultaneously in comparison to a slow-release fed-batch
                      with glucose. One repetition screening was done under the
                      same conditions. These diverse operational modes revealed
                      great differences in strain selection and quality of
                      specific GFP yield. The best strains for a fed-batch would
                      be unlikely found in either batch mode. A dependence on the
                      carbon source and the operational mode was found in
                      relevance to the regulating promoter for gene expression. A
                      fed-batch screening points out to be the most secure way to
                      select the right strain for a fed-batch production process.},
      keywords     = {Fed-batch-Verfahren (SWD) / Schüttelkolben (SWD) /
                      Hansenula polymorpha (SWD) / Escherichia coli (SWD) /
                      Gluconobacter oxydans (SWD) / Diffusion (SWD) / Glucose
                      (SWD) / Grün fluoreszierendes Protein (SWD) / Freisetzung
                      (SWD)},
      cin          = {416510},
      ddc          = {570},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)416510_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      urn          = {urn:nbn:de:hbz:82-opus-19909},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/62434},
}