h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Simon:698365,
      author       = {Simon, Jan},
      othercontributors = {Triesch, Eberhard and Rautenbach, Dieter},
      title        = {{R}econstructing {C}olourings of {F}inite {G}roups},
      school       = {RWTH Aachen University},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Aachen},
      reportid     = {RWTH-2017-07674},
      pages        = {1 Online-Ressource (142 Seiten) : Illustrationen},
      year         = {2017},
      note         = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen
                      University; Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, 2017},
      abstract     = {This thesis strives to promote a consistently combinatorial
                      approach to study reconstruction problems on finite groups
                      and $G$-sets. At the centre of this endeavour is the notion
                      of the combinatorial $k$-deck coming in its two flavours for
                      colourings and subsets. The combinatorial $k$-deck of a
                      colouring $c$ of a finite $G$-set $X$ is defined as the
                      multiset of equivalence classes of restrictions of $c$ to
                      $k$-element subsets of $X$ (the so-called $k$-patches) that
                      are moved around by the action of $G$, thus providing the
                      notion of equivalence. Put another way, the combinatorial
                      $k$-deck counts, for each $k$-patch, how many equivalent
                      copies of it appear in $c$. The dominating notion of
                      $k$-deck in the literature is a bit different: There,
                      arithmetic calculations with the "colours" (that are indeed
                      numbers) are performed resulting in analytic expressions
                      satisfying certain invariance properties. The name
                      analytical $k$-deck (as opposed to the combinatorial
                      $k$-deck) is suggested and consistently used here. The
                      combinatorial $k$-deck always determines the analytical
                      $k$-deck. Conversely, the colour set $F$ and the analytical
                      $\bigl((|F|-1)k\bigr)$-deck together determine the
                      combinatorial $k$-deck provided that
                      $F\subseteq\mathbb{R}_{\geq 0}$. The gap between the
                      smallest $k_1$ for which the combinatorial $k_1$-deck is
                      able to distinguish between two given colourings and the
                      smallest $k_2$ for which the analytical $k_2$-deck is able
                      to do so may become arbitrarily large - even after a
                      suitable change of colour values in favour of the analytical
                      deck (whose reconstruction qualities are sensitive to the
                      choice of the colour values). However, even for the
                      combinatorial deck there is no global reconstruction number
                      $k_0\in\mathbb{N}$, such that for all finite groups $G$, all
                      finite $G$-sets $X$ and all (finite) colour sets $F$ each
                      colouring $c:X\longrightarrow F$ is reconstructible from its
                      combinatorial $\operatorname{min}\{k_0,|X|\}$-deck. It is
                      unknown whether there is a global subset reconstruction
                      number for all finite groups. In this respect the
                      5-transitive Mathieu groups $M_{12}$ and $M_{24}$ show that
                      such a global subset reconstruction number would have to be
                      at least 6. A full combinatorial understanding of all 3-deck
                      failures of subsets in cyclic groups up to (and including)
                      order 24 is obtained, mainly by considering so-called
                      self-complementary subsets $A\subseteq G$ for which there is
                      some $g\in G$ with $gA=G\smallsetminus A$.
                      Self-complementary subsets also explain a great amount of
                      3-deck failures in dicyclic groups. This thesis contains
                      several positive reconstruction results, too. While the
                      focus in the literature was so far mainly on cyclic or
                      Abelian groups, the techniques suggested here are, in
                      principle, applicable to all finite groups. One of them is
                      the method of anchors, where the merits of sticking
                      consistently to the combinatorial approach become
                      particularly evident. Anchors show, for instance, that a
                      colouring of a finite group with non-empty colour class $A$
                      is reconstructible from the combinatorial
                      $\left(\left\lfloor\operatorname{log}_2
                      |A|\right\rfloor+2\right)$-deck. (This was previously shown
                      for subsets but the proof was more involved.) Another way to
                      obtain positive reconstruction results (for the 3-deck only)
                      is by means of certain matrices derived from the group
                      matrix. The approach is a generalization of an idea which
                      was previously applied to cyclic groups only. Applications
                      include results for certain dihedral groups and for
                      $p$-groups. One if these results is the following one: If
                      $G$ is a finite $p$-group of order $|G|\geq 3$ and
                      $A\subseteq G$ with $p\nmid|A|$ then any colouring of $G$
                      with one of its colour classes equal to $A$ is
                      reconstructible from the 3-deck.},
      cin          = {113210 / 110000},
      ddc          = {510},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)113210_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)110000_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      doi          = {10.18154/RWTH-2017-07674},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/698365},
}