h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Hering:711485,
      author       = {Hering, Sabine},
      othercontributors = {Unger, Tim Daniel and Köhler, Sina-Mareen},
      title        = {{D}er Übergangsbegriff in der beruflichen {B}ildung : eine
                      {D}ispositivanalyse zur berufspädagogischen {F}ormierung
                      von Übergängen im {Z}entrum disziplinärer
                      {W}issensordnungen},
      school       = {Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Aachen},
      reportid     = {RWTH-2017-10836},
      pages        = {1 Online-Ressource (522 Seiten) : Illustrationen},
      year         = {2017},
      note         = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen
                      University 2018; Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälische
                      Technische Hochschule Aachen, 2017},
      abstract     = {This research paper is focusing on the concept of
                      transition in vocational training and education. With this
                      an extensive topic stands out, which has to meet different
                      system logics based on its link to central social
                      institutions situated between education and occupation.
                      Transitional phenomena are therefore often established in an
                      interdisciplinary an interparadigmatic way. In the field of
                      vocational education and training transitions are primary
                      referring to certain institutional thresholds, which are
                      situated between specific transitional age phases like
                      school, vocational training and occupation. Noticeable is
                      the dominance of systemic considerations, which are closely
                      related to the structure of outgoing and incoming
                      institutions. This integrates a wide variety of
                      perspectives, which - in the analysis of transition - is
                      transferable to the symbiotic relation between structure and
                      subject level. How transitions are perceived and dealt with
                      in the disciplinary context is dynamically interwoven with
                      the scientific views and profile of vocational pedagogics
                      and the predominant orders of knowledge. What is meant by
                      that? In the perspective of socio-scientific dispositive
                      analysis it is supposed that reality is not objectively
                      given, but is socially constructed and modified. Everything
                      that seems to be true, visible and significant at a given
                      point in time is determined by the unique interaction of the
                      various elements of reality. The heterogeneous entity of
                      social reality which includes the special form and design of
                      discourses, institutions, buildings, everyday things, social
                      practices, habits and (inter-)acting subjects is of
                      importance. From the perspective of transitions, which are
                      specific to an age group, it could be of potential interest
                      how transitional decisions, for example between primary and
                      secondary schools or subsequent to school with focus on the
                      vocational education, are formed or determined by the
                      relation between individual expectations and attitudes of
                      entitlement and defined rationality and structural models on
                      an institutional level. It should also be questioned why
                      established methods and orders of knowledge arise at a given
                      point in historical time and on what social layers of
                      problems they try to answer or react (see
                      Bührmann/Schneider 2008, 105). How we think and talk about
                      a topic, which habits and methods we develop in action, is
                      essentially influenced by the dispositive interplay of the
                      different facets or elements of reality. Similar to this,
                      the handling of (new) topics of phenomena in the scientific
                      context may be defined. Transferring the assumptions of
                      dispositive analyses to the field of vocational transition
                      research it can be asked, which social conditions and
                      problem areas contributed to the fact that - within the last
                      three decades - a topic in vocational pedagogics was
                      established that emerges due to its high complexity and
                      momentum in the discourse. At this point we can anticipate,
                      that the field of vocational pedagogics, addressing the
                      intensifying transitional problems since the 90s, complies
                      to the dispositive structure serving the same targets and
                      rationalities to handle social transition problems.
                      Disciplinal-normative constructs and popular concepts
                      dominate, which do not satisfy the demands imposed by a
                      changing social reality. This indicates that the discipline,
                      pedagogic support and the solution of the diverse
                      self-addressed transition problems, is coming to its limits.
                      To understand the presenting social science practice, the
                      practice of action and the defining momentum behind it,
                      different approaches are necessary, which engage with this
                      progress in an empirically comprehensible way and offer
                      opportunities for reflection and differentiation. Up to now
                      there are only few research papers that dealt with the
                      social structure of the transition topic in the vocational
                      pedagogical field focusing on the discourse or dispositive
                      analysis. To look into the research perspective of the
                      dispositive analysis, this paper focuses on transitions in
                      the dimension of objectivations and discursive practices.
                      This paper follows two aims: First it wants to contribute to
                      an intensified research of transition with focus on the
                      discourse and dispositive analysis. Therefore a
                      methodological way is chosen, that differs from the common
                      direction of empirical academic studies concerning
                      transitions. Using the method of social dispositive
                      analysis, a step by step description of how the concept of
                      transition in the vocational education evolved and how its
                      structure and complexity can be defined. Secondly the
                      analytical questioning is always related to the disciplinary
                      field of vocational pedagogics. Accordingly, the objective
                      is to enable a theoretical approach to the concept of
                      transition from the perspective of vocational education. At
                      the same time a new perspective on the formation and
                      variation of subjects in the center of attention of
                      disciplinary orders of knowledge and implicitness should be
                      created.},
      cin          = {731210},
      ddc          = {370},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)731210_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      doi          = {10.18154/RWTH-2017-10836},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/711485},
}