% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Schmidt:760372,
author = {Schmidt, Isabelle Gertrud},
othercontributors = {Triesch, Eberhard and Koster, Arie Marinus},
title = {{V}arianten zur {M}atching {E}xtendability in {G}raphen},
school = {RWTH Aachen University},
type = {Dissertation},
address = {Aachen},
reportid = {RWTH-2019-04138},
pages = {1 Online-Ressource (iv, 114 Seiten) : Illustrationen},
year = {2019},
note = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen
University; Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, 2019},
abstract = {On the one hand a 1-matching or simply a matching of a
graph G=(V,E) is a set of pairwise non incident edges. On
the other hand it can be described as an edge function which
maps the values 0 and 1 to the edges of G such that the sum
of values of incident edges to each vertex is at most 1. A
1-matching is called perfect if the sum of incident edges in
each vertex equals 1. We define the size of a 1-matching as
the sum of values over all edgesWe say that a graph G is
1-matching k-extendable if every matching of size k in G
extends to a perfect matching of G. The extendability number
of G is the maximal integer k such that G is 1-matching
k-extendable. Describing a 1-matching as an edge function
yields to the more general concept of b-matchings. In
analogy to the 1-matching extendability we define the
b-matching extendability and the 2-matching extendability as
a special case. In this thesis we study the complexity of
determining the extendability number for 2- and b-matchings.
After a brief survey of the theory on 1-matching
extendability we present a result of hackfeld from 2013. He
proved that the extendability problem is co-NP-complete for
general graphs. Furthermore, we discuss a result of Zhang
und Zhang showing that there is a polynomial time algorithm
which computes the 1-matching extendability number of
bipartite graphs. We generalize both results for 2-and
b-matchings. Considering the extendability for 2-Matchings
it points out that different approaches seem to be natural.
Thus we introduce the concepts of simple, Typ A and Typ B
2-matching k-extendability. For these concepts we transfer a
basic property of 1-matching k-extendable graphs. In
particular, we show that a graph which is simple (resp. Typ
A or Typ B) k-extendable is simple (resp. Typ A or Typ B)
(k-1)-extendable. Moreover, we prove that for general graphs
the problem of determining the simple, Typ A and Typ B
2-matching extendability number is co-NP-complete by using
an analog deduction to the proof of Hackfelds result. For
the Typ B 2-matching extendability we obtain the same
statement from the following result on the b-matching
extendability. In particular, we generalize all results of
Typ B for general and bipartite graphs to the b-matching
extendability. We give an (alternative) algorithm which
determines the b-matching extendability number for bipartite
graphs. This procedure generalizes the result of Zhang und
Zhang for the 1-matching extendability number of bipartite
graphs.},
cin = {113210 / 110000},
ddc = {510},
cid = {$I:(DE-82)113210_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)110000_20140620$},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
doi = {10.18154/RWTH-2019-04138},
url = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/760372},
}