h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Voulis:761464,
      author       = {Voulis, Igor},
      othercontributors = {Reusken, Arnold and Stevenson, Rob and Melcher, Christof},
      title        = {{A} space-time approach to two-phase stokes flow:
                      well-posedness and discretization},
      school       = {RWTH Aachen University},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Aachen},
      reportid     = {RWTH-2019-04874},
      pages        = {1 Online-Ressource (136 Seiten)},
      year         = {2019},
      note         = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen
                      University; Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, 2019},
      abstract     = {In this thesis we consider a time-dependent Navier-Stokes
                      two-phase flow. A standard sharp interface model for the
                      fluid dynamics of two-phase flows is studied both from an
                      analytical and a numerical perspective. The Navier-Stokes
                      interface problem has discontinuous density and viscosity
                      coefficients. In such a setting the pressure solution and
                      gradient of the velocity solution are discontinuous across
                      an evolving interface. A closely related linear problem is
                      the two-phase Stokes problem. Despite the fact that this
                      linear Stokes interface problem is a strong simplification
                      of the two-phase Navier-Stokes flow, it is a good model
                      problem for the development of numerical methods. We are
                      particularly interested in a well-posed variational
                      formulation of this Stokes interface problem in a Eulerian
                      setting. We prefer a Eulerian formulation of the Stokes
                      interface problem because we discretize the problem in
                      Euclidean coordinates. Several well-posed formulations are
                      considered. We prove the well-posedness of a variational
                      space-time formulation in suitable spaces of divergence free
                      functions. A variant with a pressure Lagrange multiplier is
                      also considered. With a discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method
                      in mind, we formulate a well-posed discontinuous-in-time
                      version of the problem. The discontinuous-in-time
                      variational formulation involving the pressure variable for
                      the divergence free constraint is a natural starting point
                      for a space-time finite element discretization. Such methods
                      are discussed in an abstract setting in this thesis. We
                      consider discontinuous Galerkin time discretization methods
                      for abstract parabolic problems with inhomogeneous linear
                      constraints. This includes the Stokes problem with an
                      inhomogeneous (time-dependent) Dirichlet boundary condition
                      and/or an inhomogeneous divergence constraint. Another
                      problem of this kind is the heat equation with an
                      inhomogeneous boundary condition. Two common ways of
                      treating abstract saddle-point problems exist, namely
                      explicit or implicit (via Lagrange multipliers). Therefore,
                      different variational formulations of the parabolic problem
                      with constraints are introduced. For these formulations,
                      different modifications of a standard discontinuous Galerkin
                      time discretization method are considered. Different ways of
                      treating the linear constraints, e.g. ~by using an
                      appropriate projection, are introduced and analyzed. For
                      these discretizations, optimal error bounds, including
                      superconvergence results, are derived. Discretization error
                      bounds for the Lagrange multiplier are presented. Results of
                      experiments confirm the theoretically predicted optimal
                      convergence rates and show that without a modification the
                      (standard) DG method has suboptimal convergence behavior. We
                      consider two explicit examples: the heat equation and the
                      (two-phase) Stokes problem. Fully discrete schemes are
                      discussed in both cases, where the temporal DG scheme is
                      combined with a spatial continuous Galerkin (CG) scheme. For
                      the heat equation we show an optimal error bound with
                      respect to the energy norm. For the Stokes problem a dynamic
                      spatial mesh is considered because it is a useful tool to
                      limit the computational cost for two-phase flow problems
                      where a fine mesh is only necessary near the moving
                      interface. In the case of the one-phase Stokes problem, we
                      show global error bounds which are locally optimal. This is
                      done for the velocity and for the pressure Lagrange
                      multiplier. A space-time scheme for the two-phase Stokes
                      problem is introduced, including a discrete temporal
                      derivative with a discontinuous time-dependent coefficient.
                      Several numerical experiments are performed in the software
                      package DROPS. Standard finite element spaces have a poor
                      approximation quality for discontinuous unknowns. We show
                      the merit of the use of an extended finite element method.
                      This allows us to treat the discontinuity in pressure and
                      gives us an improved method.},
      cin          = {111710 / 110000},
      ddc          = {510},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)111710_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)110000_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      doi          = {10.18154/RWTH-2019-04874},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/761464},
}