guest ::
| 001 | 800922 | ||
| 005 | 20230215042734.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a G:(EU-Grant)892979 |d 892979 |2 CORDIS |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a G:(EU-Call)H2020-MSCA-IF-2019 |d H2020-MSCA-IF-2019 |2 CORDIS |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a corda__h2020::892979 |2 originalID |
| 035 | _ | _ | |a G:(EU-Grant)892979 |
| 150 | _ | _ | |a Understanding spelling conflicts. A case study of new standard languages in the former Yugoslavia in the European context |y 2020-12-01 - 2023-02-28 |
| 371 | _ | _ | |a Nottingham Trent University |b NTU |d United Kingdom |e http://www.ntu.ac.uk/ |v CORDIS |
| 372 | _ | _ | |a H2020-MSCA-IF-2019 |s 2020-12-01 |t 2023-02-28 |
| 450 | _ | _ | |a SPELLFLICT |w d |y 2020-12-01 - 2023-02-28 |
| 510 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-588b)5098525-5 |a European Union |2 CORDIS |
| 680 | _ | _ | |a This project will produce a descriptive model of orthographic controversies of four newly standardized South Slavonic languages since the 1990s, which will take into account other European languages with recent history of spelling reforms/changes. It is the first interdisciplinary and multiple comparative study, integrating top-down and bottom-up analysis of language standardization. It will provide a model for future studies and so launch me as a world-leader in sociolinguistics and language policy & planning of spelling codification.
Since the beginning of mass education, standard languages have been undergoing spelling reforms/changes producing conflicts to a greater or lesser extent. The most recent were in Czech, Dutch, French, German and Portuguese in the 1990s. The conflicts related to writing among South Slavs have a long history that continues even today, causing discrimination and violence. In the last decade, 3 spelling reforms occurred (Montenegrin 2009, Croatian 2013, Bosnian 2018), creating (inter)national spelling conflicts, which gives an excellent comparative frame and timely opportunity for this study.
My experience as a practicing Croatian orthographer has given me first-hand insights in the complexity of language codification. To understand better the relation between spelling and identity and to mitigate future conflicts, this study takes a comprehensive comparative approach that combines analysis of: A. speakers’ attitudes, B. media coverage (a discourse, argument and metaphor analysis of the relevant articles), C. the methodology and process of orthographic codification and D. socio-political context (stakeholders, legislation and procedures in a context). |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:883369 |p authority:GRANT |p authority |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:883369 |
| 970 | _ | _ | |a oai:dnet:corda__h2020::37d12c7533955794883becb2e4776c38 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a G |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a CORDIS |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a AUTHORITY |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|