h1

% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Hfer:803170,
      author       = {Höfer, Tim Moritz},
      othercontributors = {Madlener, Reinhard and von Nitzsch, Rüdiger},
      title        = {{T}ransition towards a renewable energy infrastructure:
                      spatial interdependencies and stakeholder preferences; 1.
                      {A}uflage},
      volume       = {79},
      school       = {RWTH Aachen University},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Aachen},
      publisher    = {E.ON Energy Research Center, RWTH Aachen University},
      reportid     = {RWTH-2020-09538},
      isbn         = {978-3-942789-78-3},
      series       = {E.ON Energy Research Center ; FCN, Institute for Future
                      Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior},
      pages        = {1 Online-Ressource (117 Seiten) : Illustrationen,
                      Diagramme},
      year         = {2020},
      note         = {Auch veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH
                      Aachen University; Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University,
                      2020},
      abstract     = {This dissertation analyzes the past and the expected future
                      impacts of the energy transition in Germany on the
                      electricity infrastructure. The first part of the
                      dissertation examines the costs for reducing the output of
                      renewables in order to maintain the stability of the
                      electricity infrastructure - the so-called renewable energy
                      curtailment costs. This part employs a spatial econometric
                      model to estimate the regionally varying curtailment costs
                      of different renewable energy technologies. The second part
                      evaluates four possible future energy transition pathways by
                      taking multiple stakeholder preferences into account. It
                      establishes a participatory decision-making framework by
                      using Value-Focused Thinking and Multi-Attribute Utility
                      Theory. The key finding of the first part is that wind
                      energy systems constitute the main driver for the rising
                      curtailment costs. The political recommendation derived from
                      this is to set different regional price signals for
                      renewables. One insight of the second part of the
                      dissertation is that an energy transition as envisaged by
                      the German transmission system operators is considered as
                      not sufficient for the stakeholders involved. Instead, the
                      stakeholders prefer an energy transition with more ambitious
                      climate protection targets that is internationally
                      well-coordinated and that fosters citizen participation.},
      cin          = {080052 / 816110},
      ddc          = {330},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)080052_20160101$ / $I:(DE-82)816110_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11 / PUB:(DE-HGF)3},
      doi          = {10.18154/RWTH-2020-09538},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/803170},
}