% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Make:816674,
author = {Make, Michael Karl Petronella},
othercontributors = {Behr, Marek and Elgeti, Stefanie Nicole},
title = {{S}pline-based methods for aerothermoelastic problems},
school = {Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen},
type = {Dissertation},
address = {Aachen},
publisher = {RWTH Aachen University},
reportid = {RWTH-2021-03363},
pages = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen, Diagramme},
year = {2021},
note = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen
University; Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische
Hochschule Aachen, 2021},
abstract = {This thesis investigates the role of geometry
representation in the numerical analysis of
aerothermoelastic problems. Nowadays, numerical analysis on
spline-based geometric objects is possible through
isogeometric analysis (IGA) by utilizing the spline-basis
for numerical analysis. Although IGA allows for the analysis
of volumetric splines, generating such splines is not
trivial. For the analysis of thin-walled elastic structures,
this drawback can be circumvented by applying shell-theory.
For most fluid problems, however, such a workaround does not
exist. The NURBS-enhanced finite element method (NEFEM)
solves this issue by requiring only the domain boundaries to
be defined using splines. Both the NEFEM and IGAprovide an
exact geometric boundary representation for numerical
analysis. In the current work, NEFEM and IGA are coupled to
provide a spline-based coupling interface in the context of
fluid-structure interaction (FSI). The coupling is done
within a strongly coupled partitioned solver framework,
which allows for Dirichlet-Neumann (DN) and Robin-Neumann
(RN) coupling. Combining NEFEM and IGA leads to a
geometrically compatible fluid-structure interface defined
by a single common spline. This enables a consistent and
conservative transfer of coupling data between the fluid and
structural domains. Furthermore, the common spline interface
enables the direct integration of coupling quantities on the
fluid and structural domains using the spline-basis. The
numerical performance of the spline-based solver framework
is investigated through a set of example problems. For
compressible and incompressible flow problems, not
considering FSI, improved numerical accuracy is observed
when the exact geometry is considered through the NEFEM. An
extension of this investigation to FSI problems shows
similar behavior. It is found that especially fully-enclosed
Dirichlet-bounded problems can benefit from the accurate
boundary representation provided by the proposed
spline-based method. Furthermore, the given examples show
that using a common spline-basis can improve the numerical
stability of the employed spatial coupling procedures. This
observation is especially relevant for thermal coupled
problems, for which such instabilities could lead to the
inability to obtain converged numerical solutions.},
cin = {416010},
ddc = {620},
cid = {$I:(DE-82)416010_20140620$},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
doi = {10.18154/RWTH-2021-03363},
url = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/816674},
}