% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Stittgen:837886,
author = {Stittgen, Tobias},
othercontributors = {Schleifenbaum, Johannes Henrich and Nyhuis, Peter},
title = {{G}rundlagen zur produktionslogistischen {P}ositionierung
im {U}mfeld der {A}dditiven {F}ertigung am {B}eispiel des
{L}aser {P}owder {B}ed {F}usion; 1. {A}uflage},
school = {RWTH Aachen University},
type = {Dissertation},
address = {Aachen},
publisher = {Apprimus Verlag},
reportid = {RWTH-2022-00151},
pages = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen, Diagramme},
year = {2021},
note = {Druckversion: 2021. - Auch veröffentlicht auf dem
Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University 2022;
Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, 2021},
abstract = {Additive manufacturing technologies are on the brink of
industrialization in numerous industries. While in the past
the production of prototypes, tools and small series enabled
significant shortening of innovation and development cycles,
the respective technologies are now also increasingly
relevant for industrial series production due to increased
assembly speeds, a comprehensive materials portfolio and
increased process reliability. In this context,
manufacturing aspects such as the improvement of process
parameters, the application of methods for process
monitoring as well as the further development of
manufacturing equipment are the focus of scientific and
industrial efforts. Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) is
attracting particular attention from industrial users
because of its ability to produce complex metallic
components without the use of tools. Today, users of this
technology are increasingly facing challenges in the
production environment as industrialization progresses.
These operational challenges are met in the environment of
conventional manufacturing by means of methods and processes
from the field of production systematics. Since a
description of production logistic target values and key
performance indicators, which can be located in the
interface area of additive manufacturing and production
systematics, has not yet been carried out in a
process-specific manner, established procedures for
overcoming operational challenges are not applicable. The
objective of the present work is therefore the definition
and development of concepts, key performance indicators and
methods by means of which the specifics of additive
manufacturing technologies can also be considered from the
perspective of production systematics. The relevant fields
of action are addressed in such a way that the need for
sustainable implementation of additive manufacturing
processes is taken into account. The methodology developed
serves as a basis for decision-making along the process
chain of the LPBF technology for company-specific production
logistics positioning. In addition to simplifying
decision-making on production-related issues, an integrated
approach also identifies rationalization potential for
value-adding process steps upstream of the manufacturing
process. For users of additive manufacturing technology,
appropriate production logistics positioning results in a
unique selling proposition that goes beyond technical
mastery of the manufacturing process and thus serves as a
competitive advantage.},
cin = {421510},
ddc = {620},
cid = {$I:(DE-82)421510_20170406$},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
doi = {10.18154/RWTH-2022-00151},
url = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/837886},
}
guest ::