h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Mozaffari:843585,
      author       = {Mozaffari, Amirpasha},
      othercontributors = {Reicherter, Klaus and Vereecken, Harry},
      title        = {{T}owards 3{D} crosshole {GPR} full-waveform inversion},
      school       = {Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Aachen},
      publisher    = {RWTH Aachen University},
      reportid     = {RWTH-2022-03244},
      pages        = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen},
      year         = {2022},
      note         = {Englische und deutsche Zusammenfassung. - Veröffentlicht
                      auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University;
                      Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule
                      Aachen, 2022},
      abstract     = {High-resolution imaging of the subsurface improves our
                      understanding of the subsurface flow and solute
                      transportation that can directly help us protect groundwater
                      resources and remediate contaminated sites. The ground
                      penetrating radar (GPR) is a useful non/minimal invasive
                      method that consists of a transmitter (Tx) unit that emits
                      electromagnetic (EM) waves and a receiver (Rx) that measures
                      the arriving electromagnetic waves and can provide
                      high-resolution tomograms of the subsurface properties. In
                      specific, the crosshole GPR setup in which two-neighbouring
                      boreholes are placed in the earth can provide much more
                      in-depth access to the target area. However, the
                      interpretation of the GPR data remains challenging. The
                      simpler ray-based inversion (RBI) is computationally
                      attractive while fail to provide high-resolution tomograms
                      as the results always smoothed over the target area. The
                      full-waveform inversion (FWI) can provide detailed
                      subsurface tomograms that can carry up to more than an order
                      of the magnitude resolution compared to RBI from the same
                      data set. A sophisticated method such as FWI requires
                      detailed modelling tools and powerful inversion algorithm
                      that needs significant computational resources. In last
                      decades, by exponential increase in computing power and the
                      memory, alongside to wider usage of high performance
                      computing resources; FWI application in GPR data gain
                      popularity. All these computational advances such as FWI
                      method. could be very demanding to be modelled in 3D domain.
                      Thus, some fundamentals assumptions are made to reduce the
                      computational requirements, especially computational time
                      and required memory by using 2D modeling domain. Despite the
                      usefulness of these simplifications, these assumptions led
                      to introducing inaccuracy that compromises the performance
                      of the FWI in complex structures. We investigated the effect
                      of the assumption that enables us to use a 2D model instead
                      of a computationally expensive 3D modelling to simulate the
                      EM propagation. These assumptions are made for specific
                      state that not necessary is always valid, and therefore it
                      can introduce inaccuracies in transferred data. Study of
                      several synthetic cases revealed that the performance of the
                      3D to 2D transformation in complex structures such as high
                      contrast layer is much lower than what is anticipated.
                      Therefore, in the complex subsurface system; 2D transferred
                      data inherently carry inaccuracy that jeopardises the
                      accuracy of any further analysis such as FWI. Thus, we
                      introduced a FWI that utilise a native 3D forward model to
                      use the original measured 3D data. The novel method is
                      called 2.5D FWI, and it showed improvements compared to 2D
                      FWI for synthetic and measured data.A better modelling tool
                      such as the 3D forward model provides a useful platform for
                      simulating the subsurface and measuring devices involved to
                      a higher degree of accuracy. We used previously introduced
                      3D forward model to build a realistic model of the GPR Tx
                      and Rx antenna that called finite-length antennas and the
                      boreholes that these antenna are placed to carry out the
                      measurements. Our studies showed that realistic antenna and
                      borehole-fluid representation provides more realistic
                      travel-time and wave-form shape for GPR data. These more
                      accurate simulated data increases the accuracy of the FWI
                      results as reducing the uncertainty in the inversion
                      system.It is a known issue for GPR community that EM waves
                      that travelled with a high-angle between the Tx and Rx shows
                      inconsistency in their travel-time and therefore could
                      jeopardise travel-time inversion results. Even though this
                      effect is almost consistent, there was no concerts reason
                      for this issue except systematic erroneous measurements.
                      Thus, it is common pre-processing standard to discard these
                      high-angle data (usually above 50°). Our findings regarding
                      the contribution of the borehole-fluid to changes in
                      travel-time of the EM waves showed the high-angle
                      travel-time is not an error rather than consistent effect
                      the borehole-fluid in travel times. We laid the mathematical
                      explanation of this phenomena and introduced a correction
                      method that could predict this issue and compensate for it.
                      Lastly, we applied this correction method on the realistic
                      synthetic data and showed that RBI results improved when the
                      correction method is used.},
      cin          = {531320 / 530000},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)531320_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)530000_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      doi          = {10.18154/RWTH-2022-03244},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/843585},
}