h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Eiden:855732,
      author       = {Eiden, Sophia Charlotte},
      othercontributors = {Weinhold, Elmar and Albrecht, Markus},
      title        = {{C}harakterisierung der {B}indung humaner {P}roteine an
                      {G}-{Q}uadruplex-{DNA} und -{RNA}},
      school       = {RWTH Aachen University},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Aachen},
      publisher    = {RWTH Aachen University},
      reportid     = {RWTH-2022-10395},
      pages        = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen, Diagramme},
      year         = {2022},
      note         = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen
                      University; Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University, 2022},
      abstract     = {The doctoral project presented in this work was dedicated
                      to the characterization of the binding properties of nuclear
                      proteins in relation to so-called G-quadruplex nucleic acid
                      structures. The G-quadruplex is a special secondary
                      structure of nucleic acids in which four guanine molecules
                      within a sequence come together to form a planar tetrad.
                      Different numbers of such G-tetrads combine to form
                      different types of this unusual secondary structure. The
                      binding of the proteins was analyzed with regard to
                      G-quadruplex structures (Myc22-DNA, Myc22-RNA, CEB25-L111,
                      CEB25-L191) and non-G-quadruplex structures (guanine-rich
                      ssDNA and dsDNA). Both the deoxyribooligonucleotide and the
                      ribooligonucleotide of the Myc22 sequence already used by
                      Rauser (Valerie Rauser, PhD thesis RWTH, 2019) were used
                      here. Analogously to the method described by Rauser for
                      generating monomeric structures of the G-quadruplex (G4)
                      Pu27 DNA or Myc22 DNA under basic conditions, a method for
                      generating monomeric Myc22 RNA structures was first
                      established at the beginning of the project. The success of
                      each treatment approach was verified by analytical methods
                      such as size exclusion chromatography (SEC) and
                      polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). The pretreated
                      oligonucleotides, folded into monomeric G4 structures, were
                      then used for binding studies with certain predominantly
                      nuclear proteins - starting from proteins that were
                      identified by Rauser in 2019 as promising G4 binding
                      candidates through proteomic analyzes of ovarian cancer cell
                      lysates. As preliminary work for these binding studies, some
                      of the potential G4-binding proteins (EED, hnRNPU and YBX1),
                      each equipped with a His tag, were overexpressed in E. coli
                      cells and purified using affinity chromatography (Ni-NTA
                      column) and gel filtration. The characterization of the
                      protein binding properties to the various DNA and RNA
                      structures was carried out using biochemical and biophysical
                      methods in order to enable the most accurate possible
                      verification of the results. The pulldown assay and the EMSA
                      (electrophoretic mobility shift assay) were used as
                      biochemical methods. The pulldown assay is a type of
                      affinity chromatographic isolation method in which proteins
                      can be immobilized by their binding to
                      oligonucleotide-coated magnetic particles. The protein-DNA
                      complexes formed during the binding reaction can be
                      dissociated after repeated washing of the samples with a
                      sodium dodecyl sulfate solution (sodium dodecyl sulfate,
                      SDS) and the fixed proteins can be identified and quantified
                      by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).
                      In EMSA, a binding reaction with protein and
                      fluorophore-labeled (Cy5) oligonucleotide is set up and
                      incubated. The entire binding mixture is then applied to a
                      native polyacrylamide gel, which typically reveals the
                      eponymous shift of the oligonucleotide bands compared to the
                      G4-protein complex bands. The FID assay (fluorescent
                      intercalator displacement assay, FIDA) and MST (microscale
                      thermophoresis) were used as biophysical methods. For the
                      FIDA, the unmodified oligonucleotide is first incubated with
                      a fluorophore (here acridine orange or thiazole orange) and
                      this mixture is then gradually titrated with increasing
                      concentrations of protein. Here, the successive decrease in
                      fluorescence due to the displacement of the fluorophore by
                      the added protein is recorded. In principle, microscale
                      thermophoresis is also based on the titration of a
                      Cy5-modified oligonucleotide of constant concentration with
                      different protein concentrations. The evaluation is carried
                      out by detecting the change in fluorescence or by
                      quantifying the G4-protein complex formed as a function of
                      the protein concentration used. After carrying out the
                      various binding assays, the respective results for each
                      protein to be characterized were analyzed, compared and
                      classified according to G4 selectivity. It then finally
                      became apparent whether the potential G4-binding proteins
                      from previous proteomic analyzes are in fact G4 binders or
                      whether there are deviations. In the end, a clearly
                      recognizable G4 selectivity could only be seen for some of
                      the proteins examined. Some of the other candidates showed
                      an increased guanine selectivity, some showed a complete
                      lack of selectivity in relation to the nucleic acid
                      structures used.},
      cin          = {152620 / 150000},
      ddc          = {540},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)152620_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)150000_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      doi          = {10.18154/RWTH-2022-10395},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/855732},
}