h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Struck:954234,
      author       = {Struck, Franziska},
      othercontributors = {Flamme, Sabine and Walther, Grit and Greiff, Kathrin},
      title        = {{B}ewertung der {R}essourceneffizienz von
                      {B}aukonstruktionen : {E}ntwicklung und {A}nwendung eines
                      {B}ewertungssystems},
      school       = {Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Aachen},
      publisher    = {RWTH Aachen University},
      reportid     = {RWTH-2023-03037},
      pages        = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen, Diagramme},
      year         = {2023},
      note         = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen
                      University; Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische
                      Hochschule Aachen, 2023},
      abstract     = {The construction sector is responsible for a large
                      consumption of energy and raw materials,which results in
                      large amounts of waste and emissions. Consequently,
                      construction elements(walls, roofs etc.) that are
                      resource-efficient during their entire life cycle are
                      needed. Resourceefficiency is defined as the quotient of the
                      benefit of a construction element (e. g., its propertieslike
                      sound and fire protection or thermal insulation) and the
                      resource input required fora construction element over its
                      life cycle. Three resources are taken into acount: energy,
                      rawmaterials and the resulting impact on ecosystems.
                      Existing legislation has already achievedprogress in the
                      area of energy. However, there is a need for improvement in
                      the areas of rawmaterials and ecosystems, as political goals
                      fixed in legislation are insufficient and raw materialsare
                      regulated exclusively through waste legislation.The
                      construction sector is responsible for $63\%$ of raw
                      material consumption, $40\%$ of energyconsumption and $35\%$
                      of CO2-emissions in Germany. This high resource consumption
                      resultsfrom the construction and use of buildings and
                      infrastructure facilities over their whole life cycle.In
                      addition, large amounts of waste are generated at the end of
                      the life cycle: $55\%$ of all Germanwaste is construction
                      and demolition waste. Consequently, resource consumption
                      must be reducedand optimized over the entire life cycle.
                      This requires construction elements (walls, roofs,etc.) that
                      are resource-efficient over the entire life cycle. Resource
                      efficiency is defined as thequotient of the benefit of the
                      construction (e. g., its properties like sound and fire
                      protection orthermal insulation) and the resource input
                      required for a construction element over its entirelife
                      cycle. Resources in this context are energy, raw materials
                      and the resulting impact onecosystems. Existing legislation
                      has already achieved progress in the area of energy.
                      However,there is a need for improvement in the areas of raw
                      materials and ecosystems, as political goalsfixed in
                      legislation are insufficient and raw materials are regulated
                      exclusively through wastelegislation.To increase resource
                      efficiency, architects and civil engineers must be able to
                      use resource-efficientconstruction elements when planning
                      buildings or designing construction products. To this
                      end,resource efficiency must be assessable as objectively as
                      possible. Evaluation should, furthermore,consider the entire
                      life cycle and the level of construction elements. An
                      approach at thislevel is crucial because at this stage
                      planning decisions are made and system manufacturersdesign
                      their products. Moreover, refurbishments require the
                      replacement of individuel elements.The whole life cycle is
                      important, as effects of different life cycle phases can
                      influence eachother, e. g., low material requirements in
                      manufacturing vs. lack of recyclability at end of life.In
                      addition, the particular conditions of construction compared
                      to other products shouldbe considered: Buildings are created
                      through a process of interaction of different actors andmany
                      construction products have long lifetimes so that
                      developments in e. g. manufacturing orrecycling processes
                      are likely to occur during their life cycle.Currently, there
                      are three methods for assessing resource efficiency (ESSENZ,
                      VDI 4800and Fritz). However, these have not been developed
                      for the construction sector or cannot beused for the
                      assessment of the element level. Consequently, a new
                      evaluation system for theresource efficiency of construction
                      elements throughout their full life cycle must be
                      developed.This evaluation system should build on existing
                      approaches. Thus, already existing models wereanalyzed and
                      evaluation criteria were derived. In addition to the
                      aforementioned models assessingresource efficiency, models
                      rating sustainability, individual resource aspects,
                      individual life phases (e. g., recyclability) or other
                      levels of observation (e. g., building level) were
                      included.34 criteria were considered relevant for the
                      resource efficiency of construction elements.
                      Subsequently,indicators were selected that can be evaluated
                      as objectively and transparently aspossible, as they are,
                      for example based on norms. Such indicators were identified
                      for 23 criteria.The other criteria had to be excluded due to
                      a lack of indicators. The evaluation is based onfive-level
                      tables containing specific threshold values or conditions to
                      reach a certain score.Two construction element catalogs (for
                      inner walls and floors), containing over 100 elementseach
                      were created. All necessary indicators were calculated for
                      these elements and thresholdvalues were derived using a
                      percentile-based calculation method. Today’s construction
                      elementsachieve points and differences in resource
                      efficiency are visible, but there is also an incentive
                      toimprove. An Excel tool was developed to assure
                      user-friendlyness.Afterwards, the resource efficiency of
                      interior wall and floor elements were determined, using the
                      developed evaluation system. In six use cases, each
                      comparing construction element shaving the same benefit, the
                      resource efficiency was calculated. In this manner, the most
                      resource efficient construction element can be selected for
                      a specific application, e g., in a construction project. By
                      analysing the evaluation results, factors influencing
                      resource efficiency were identified. The most important
                      factors are a long service life and the reuse of the
                      constructions. The construction method and the requirements
                      for a building structure, on the other hand, have a lesser
                      influence. Current drywall elements and construction
                      elements without requirements are more resource-efficient
                      than solid construction elements or construction elements
                      with high sound and fire protection requirements. The
                      individual construction design is, however, crucial. For
                      individual applications, solid construction elements can be
                      more resource-efficient, and a construction that does not
                      meet any requirements is not always more resource-efficient
                      than a construction that meets high requirements. In sum,
                      taking resource efficiency into consideration leads to an
                      increase of resource efficiency, as for each application
                      construction elements with very different scorings could be
                      chosen. A transfer of the evaluation system to exterior
                      walls and flat roofs shows that it is applicable regardless
                      of the type of construction (exterior, interior, horizontal
                      and vertical construction elements. The evaluation system
                      can also be transferred to the assessment of multiple uses.
                      Overall, the evaluation system developed enables a
                      quantification of resource efficiency so that designs can be
                      compared and results communicated. In addition, deficits of
                      the designs can be identified enabeling product developers
                      to improve their construction element. Planners can
                      consciously use resource-efficient construction elements in
                      new buildings and renovations. Building owners can demand
                      resource efficiency for their project, e. g., in tenders.
                      The need fore source-efficient materials and disposal
                      methods can be made clear using the rating system and
                      communicated to manufacturers and disposal companies. In
                      this way, all agents involved in the life cycle can
                      influence the resource efficiency of a construction element.
                      The developed evaluation system shows which constructions
                      are particularly resource-efficient or have a need for
                      improvement. It can contribute to increasing the resource
                      efficiency of construction elements throughout their entire
                      life cycle.},
      cin          = {813510 / 512110 / 510000 / 080053},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)813510_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)512110_20140620$ /
                      $I:(DE-82)510000_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)080053_20181017$},
      pnm          = {080053 - Forschungskolleg Verbund.NRW (080053)},
      pid          = {G:(NRW)080053},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      doi          = {10.18154/RWTH-2023-03037},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/954234},
}