% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{HansenAmpah:955533,
author = {Hansen-Ampah, Adjan Troy},
othercontributors = {Häußling, Roger Adrian Maria and Gries, Thomas},
title = {{G}emeinsam scheitern : {E}ntwicklung eines
netzwerkbasierten {I}nnovationsmodells zur
prognostizierenden ({N}achhaltigkeits-){A}nalyse
soziotechnischer {N}euerungen},
school = {Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen},
type = {Dissertation},
address = {Aachen},
publisher = {RWTH Aachen University},
reportid = {RWTH-2023-03546},
pages = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen, Diagramme},
year = {2022},
note = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen
University 2023; Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälische
Technische Hochschule Aachen, 2022},
abstract = {Innovations are considered desirable in various societal
domains including science. Especially regarding the
so-called climate crisis, future (technological) innovations
are often deemed the only viable solution. However,
innovating actors as well as innovation research seldomly
take into account whether the supposed solutions really are
ecologically beneficial, i.e., not only regarding their
development and production but also in the use phase and
other contexts of their social embedding (e.g. concerning
potential side effects and waste disposal). The criticism
gathered here touches on the core of this dissertation,
which assumes that: 1. Not only the production of an
innovation, but also its use and societal embedding must be
regarded to adequately evaluate the ecological
sustainability and (long-term) success of an innovation; 2.
Not only individual (entrepreneurial) actors but actor
networks define throughout the entire innovation process
what is to be considered as innovation success, and that
acceptance in these actor networks determines this success
(or failure); 3. The inclusion of the perspectives of
different stakeholders from all innovation phases leads to a
more complete picture and a better understanding of
innovation processes; 4. The integration of these different
perspectives - especially of actors in the (later) use phase
/ affected by the above-mentioned societal embedding of the
innovation - in early phases of innovation development
offers the possibility to proactively identify and address
potential acceptance and sustainability problems. The aim of
this dissertation is, on the one hand, the development of a
techno-sociological and network-based innovation model that
builds on the assumptions mentioned above. With the help of
multiperspectivity, i.e. by capturing the subjectively
perceived network actors and their acceptance, it is
possible to identify potential innovation problems and
reasons for failure in the earliest innovation phases. On
the other hand, the plausibility of the assumptions and the
model derived from them are verified empirically on the
basis of a concrete innovation.},
cin = {761310},
ddc = {300},
cid = {$I:(DE-82)761310_20140620$},
pnm = {Forschungskolleg Verbund.NRW},
pid = {G:(NRW)080053},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
doi = {10.18154/RWTH-2023-03546},
url = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/955533},
}