h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Boemke:977017,
      author       = {Boemke, Bruno Johannes},
      othercontributors = {Lehmkuhl, Frank and Maier, Andreas},
      title        = {{U}nlocking pattern extraction from geospatial big data -
                      methodological innovations in remote sensing and geospatial
                      analysis for environmental and geoarchaeological research},
      school       = {Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Aachen},
      publisher    = {RWTH Aachen University},
      reportid     = {RWTH-2024-00528},
      pages        = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen},
      year         = {2024},
      note         = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen
                      University; Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische
                      Hochschule Aachen, 2024},
      abstract     = {In recent decades, the amount of openly available geodata
                      has increased exponentially. To a large part, this can be
                      attributed to the technological progress in satellite remote
                      sensing, producing world-wide coverage from a large variety
                      of sensors on a sub-daily basis. In addition, improved
                      accessibility and a growing user base have favoured
                      methodological advances in geospatial analysis as well as an
                      increase in the number of derived products such as, e.g.,
                      land cover classifications. While this opens up new
                      opportunities for geospatial applications, the vast amounts
                      of geodata also challenge studies in terms of selection,
                      filtering, harmonizing, processing and interpretation. To
                      fully utilize the opportunities that the increasing amount
                      of geodata offers while tackling its challenges, new and
                      innovative methodologies for different geospatial
                      applications are needed. This cumulative dissertation is a
                      contribution to this goal in the fields of environmental
                      science and geoarchaeology. It presents three novel and
                      experimental approaches on how to effectively utilize a
                      large variety and/or long time series of geodatasets and
                      analyse them sensibly within the framework of a specific
                      research question. The first approach explores the
                      possibilities and limitations of assessing complex aeolian
                      dune field morphology and evolution using synthetic aperture
                      radar (SAR) satellite data. This study relies on the
                      Sentinel-1 mission, which acquires data in volumes of
                      approximately 600 gigabytes per day. To analyse this
                      continuous stream of geospatial big data, the study examines
                      the key interaction mechanism between C-Band radar and sand
                      dunes and introduces a visual pattern extraction method
                      based on continuous wavelet transfer. This novel method is
                      applied to the Western Mongolian dune field Bor Khyar. The
                      results give new insights into the temporal and spatial
                      dynamics of dune scales and their response to aeolian
                      activity, revealing local differences as well as inter- and
                      intra-annual variations in the dune morphology. The second
                      approach is a methodological contribution to the field of
                      archaeological predictive modelling. The main challenge of
                      this study is the extraction of a thematic pattern from a
                      small sample of 23 available Upper Palaeolithic sites in
                      Lower Austria. This is achieved using a novel approach
                      combining a classical deductive method with the capabilities
                      of machine learning. This way, ten spatial predictors
                      representing morphological, hydrological, and
                      sedimentological factors of the paleo-environment are
                      analysed for optimal, viable, and non-viable value ranges
                      and combined mathematically. The resulting predictive model
                      reveals several spatial dynamics of site probability and
                      shows high compliance with known sites in the study area. In
                      stark contrast to this study, which is challenged by the
                      small number of available sites, the third study conducts
                      geoarchaeological pattern extraction based on a
                      substantially bigger dataset of close to 4200 European Upper
                      and Final Palaeolithic sites. The main aim of this study is
                      to explore whether the site distribution is representative
                      of human distribution in the paleo-landscape or if sampling
                      biases obscure this information. To this goal, eight
                      Pan-European geodatasets representing both
                      settlement-relevant factors of the paleo-environment and
                      discovery-relevant biases of the modern to contemporary
                      landscape are analysed using a combination of geospatial and
                      geostatistical methods. The results show that the actual
                      distribution of sites seems to be most strongly influenced
                      by sampling biases. The influence of the settlement factor,
                      however, is still significant when comparing site subsets
                      from different regions, different Upper Palaeolithic
                      periods, and, especially, between open-air and cave sites.
                      The implications of this study are substantial for
                      geoarchaeological approaches, as the sampling bias is often
                      overlooked or underestimated as a factor actively
                      influencing the distribution of known sites. All three
                      approaches present a novel methodological approach in their
                      respective field of study and outline a workflow that can be
                      adapted and built on. For the availability to a broader
                      audience, all studies are published as open access. In
                      addition, the results of both geoarchaeological approaches
                      are distributed as open data in universally usable geodata
                      formats. As such, they can serve as foundation and
                      inspiration for many future studies that utilize geospatial
                      big data for environmental and geoarchaeological research.},
      cin          = {551610 / 530000},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)551610_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)530000_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11},
      doi          = {10.18154/RWTH-2024-00528},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/977017},
}