% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence % of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older. % Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or % “biber”. @PHDTHESIS{Keler:979943, author = {Keßler, Melanie}, othercontributors = {Arlinghaus, Julia and Letmathe, Peter}, title = {{T}he human factor in operations management - understanding the influence of cognitive biases in production and risk management}, school = {Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen}, type = {Dissertation}, address = {Aachen}, publisher = {RWTH Aachen University}, reportid = {RWTH-2024-01971}, pages = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen}, year = {2023}, note = {Veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University 2024; Dissertation, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, 2023}, abstract = {10 years after the introduction of the term Industry 4.0, it is becoming apparent in practice that many potentials remain unharnessed. Many companies still associate the concept of the autonomous, self-controlling factory with the hope of productivity increases and efficiency gains. Particularly in the area of production planning and control (PPC) – one of the main areas in operations management – industrial practice is hoping for increased transparency and reductions in complexity and costs through the use of digital technologies. However, these new digital technologies lead to new risks, for instance in the area of cyber security, and also change existing risk profiles. This situation requires an appropriate risk management which addresses these new risks. Despite this increasing automation, the human factor remains a key resource in the smart factory and represents as a central decision maker a crucial role in the success of digital transformation projects and risk management. Although research in behavioural economics has increased significantly in recent years, the majority of decision-making models in PPC and risk management are based on the assumption of rationally human behaviour. However, the application of these models in industrial practice shows that this often leads to problems due to the fact that people do not decide rationally and tend to be influenced in their decision-making by so called “cognitive biases”. In risk management, risks are therefore often assessed incorrectly or even ignored. In the area of PPC, process deviations frequently occur with the consequence of a deterioration in logistical performance. The aim of this dissertation is therefore to analyse how human behaviour influences decisions in operations management and subsequently the logistic performance. Furthermore, recommendations will be developed for how to consider the influencing factors in human decision making in order to improve results. Based on a structured literature review, the findings from the research fields of psychology and operations management were combined. Using a broad database of Industry 4.0 implementation projects, it was possible to observe the influence of cognitive biases in the area of human decision-making. Initial hypotheses were developed and the influence of cognitive distortions on decisions in the risk management and PPC environment was demonstrated with the help of behavioural experiments.}, cin = {812110}, ddc = {330}, cid = {$I:(DE-82)812110_20140620$}, typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11}, doi = {10.18154/RWTH-2024-01971}, url = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/979943}, }