h1

h2

h3

h4

h5
h6
% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Niesche:991823,
      author       = {Niesche, Annegret},
      othercontributors = {Radermacher, Klaus and Corves, Burkhard},
      title        = {{H}andgehaltener {M}iniaturroboter für die orthopädische
                      {C}hirurgie},
      volume       = {76},
      school       = {RWTH Aachen University},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Düren},
      publisher    = {Shaker Verlag},
      reportid     = {RWTH-2024-07914},
      series       = {Aachener Beiträge zur Medizintechnik},
      pages        = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen},
      year         = {2024},
      note         = {Druckausgabe: 2024. - Auch veröffentlicht auf dem
                      Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University; Dissertation,
                      RWTH Aachen University, 2024},
      abstract     = {Numerous assistance systems have been developed to support
                      the surgeon in effective and efficient bone machining with
                      minimally invasive access. One possibility of interaction is
                      the principle of synergistic control. It enables the robotic
                      assistance system to control and optimize individual target
                      variables while actively involving the operator into the
                      process. However, current approaches show disadvantages with
                      regard to flexible integration into the surgical work
                      environment and workflow, require invasive bone fixation or
                      offer only limited possibilities for process optimization.
                      This thesis investigates the approach of using a synergistic
                      hand-held active robot for bone machining. After manual
                      coarse positioning, the robot executes the fine movement of
                      the instrument for bone machining, thereby compensating for
                      undesired human movements. By manually repositioning the
                      robot, the accessible working space is expanded. The system
                      itself therefore can be designed with a smaller working
                      space and occupies less space in the operating room compared
                      to robots which are installed at a fixed position in the
                      room. A successful demonstration of this approach on a hard
                      material like cortical bone is not known so far. In order to
                      enable the compensation for the human reaction movements
                      caused by the process forces as well as involuntary tremor
                      and drift movements, the investigated approach was extended
                      using a mechanical support of the robot for stabilization.
                      The proposed approach has been investigated for milling the
                      implant seat in minimally invasive unicondylar knee
                      arthroplasty (UKA), i.e. for the fabrication of a
                      three-dimensional free-form surface on the bone. A
                      functional prototype of the robot, held by the operator with
                      both hands and with a weight of 2.5 kg, was realized. In
                      addition, repositioning strategies for use with a mechanical
                      support unit were presented. In milling tests on bone
                      substitute material, a deviation ranging from 0.32 mm to
                      0.99 mm (RMSE) of a machined surface from the planned
                      surface was achieved. This is within the deviation of 0.67
                      mm (RMSE, σ = 0.37 mm) achieved with the commercial,
                      visually guided NAVIO system for UKA surgery, which does not
                      allow for automated and thus systematic control of the bone
                      machining parameters (e.g. milling tool path, depth, feed
                      rate). In addition, the applicability of the hand-held robot
                      was demonstrated in a UKA surgery on a human cadaver. A
                      deviation between -0.7 mm and 0.6 mm of the machined bone
                      surface from the planned surface was achieved with a bone
                      machining time of 5 minutes for the tibial and 10 minutes
                      for the femoral condyle. Again, values comparable to the
                      NAVIO system were achieved. To sum up, milling bone using a
                      hand-held, active robot with a mechanical support is
                      possible with the accuracy and efficiency of a commercial
                      system for UKA, but with the advantage of an automated and
                      thus systematic implementation of optimal milling
                      parameters.},
      cin          = {419410},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)419410_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11 / PUB:(DE-HGF)3},
      doi          = {10.18154/RWTH-2024-07914},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/991823},
}