h1

% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@PHDTHESIS{Fhlisch:994106,
      author       = {Föhlisch, Nils},
      othercontributors = {Schuh, Günther and Burggräf, Peter},
      title        = {{K}lassifikationsbasierte {P}lanung flexibler,
                      flussorientierter {M}ixed-{M}odel-{M}ontagestrukturen; 1.
                      {A}uflage},
      volume       = {2024,2},
      school       = {RWTH Aachen University},
      type         = {Dissertation},
      address      = {Aachen},
      publisher    = {Apprimus Verlag},
      reportid     = {RWTH-2024-09093},
      isbn         = {978-3-98555-231-3},
      series       = {Ergebnisse aus der Produktionstechnik},
      pages        = {1 Online-Ressource : Illustrationen},
      year         = {2024},
      note         = {Druckausgabe: 2024. - Auch veröffentlicht auf dem
                      Publikationsserver der RWTH Aachen University. - Weitere
                      Reihe: Produktionssystematik. - Weitere Reihe: Edition
                      Wissenschaft Apprimus; Dissertation, RWTH Aachen University,
                      2024},
      abstract     = {Increasing product variance as a result of growing
                      individualization of customer requirements leads to process
                      time spread and volatility of the product mix in mixed-model
                      assembly. As a consequence, conventional line assemblies
                      reach the limits of their economic viability. Dissolving the
                      coupling and cycle dependency of stations in matrix
                      assemblies offers the potential to simultaneously improve
                      flexibility and efficiency while maintaining the flow
                      principle. Matrix and line assemblies form the flow-oriented
                      assembly structures in which assembly objects move according
                      to the flow principle. During structure planning, assembly
                      planners are increasingly faced with the question of which
                      configuration of flow-oriented assembly structures meets the
                      requirements of their use case and how flexibility can be
                      objectively incorporated as a decision criterion.
                      Classifications for assembly structures help to create
                      transparency about configurations in the solution space of
                      structural planning by differentiating central dimensions.
                      Due to the high complexity of matrix assemblies, existing
                      classification approaches cannot be used, as the dimensions
                      and characteristics used do not differentiate configurations
                      clearly. Furthermore, existing evaluation approaches are not
                      suitable for the data-based quantification of flexibility as
                      decision support in the early phase of structural planning.
                      As a result, the efficiency and effectiveness of planning
                      flexible, flow-oriented assembly structures are not ensured.
                      To address these challenges, this thesis develops a
                      structural planning methodology for the efficient and
                      data-based determination of flexible, flow-oriented assembly
                      structures by means of a classification. A defined,
                      redundance-free set of flexibility criteria allows to
                      quantitatively specify the flexibility requirements of a use
                      case through the targeted assessment of production program
                      and process time data. A level-based classification
                      organizes the configurations of flow-oriented assembly
                      structures and breaks down the interdependencies of the
                      combined structure elements. This eliminates the effort
                      involved in structuring the solution space of structural
                      planning and makes planning complexity efficiently
                      manageable. Furthermore, the structure configurations are
                      prioritized on the basis of a systematic comparison of the
                      required and provided flexibility of configurations for
                      decision support. This ensures that the structure
                      configurations offer sufficient flexibility and structural
                      planning delivers high-quality results. The
                      operationalization in a methodology and its integration into
                      a holistic assembly planning procedure makes the collected
                      insights accessible to assembly planners in a compact form.
                      Overall, the methodology enables the efficient and
                      transparent determination of assembly structures according
                      to the specific flexibility requirements of an use case.},
      cin          = {417210 / 417200},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {$I:(DE-82)417210_20140620$ / $I:(DE-82)417200_20140620$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11 / PUB:(DE-HGF)3},
      doi          = {10.18154/RWTH-2024-09093},
      url          = {https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/994106},
}